Lutron Electronics reviews

Very slow growth, no deviation from structured growth path regardless of contributions. Very slow transitions to new role if looking for change. Lots of turnover Average benefit package

•Engineering decisions would lean toward favoring current project timelines/urgent milestones to the detriment of saving time or money on future projects, although I felt like this was beginning to change •Unique mechanical design challenges seemed few and far between, although those that arose were fun to tackle. Challenges often could be traced back to PLM issues and making sense of poor, old documentation •Overall, it felt like a 'mature' technical problem space to work within, and whether that's a pro or a con depends on what you want out of your work. •Tight theoretical timelines on paper often stretched out due to forces outside your team's control, and projects would be re-prioritized to maximize manpower utilization. However, this tended to generate 'important, but not urgent' work that competed with 'important AND urgent' work for your bandwidth. The team I belonged to acknowledged this and was making concrete strides to address it systematically, but it's an unavoidable aspect of this kind of work