MIT reviews

4.4

86% would recommend to a friend

(467 total reviews)

Sally Kornbluth

91% approve of CEO

77% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

467 reviews

Reviews about "Culture"

Return to all reviews
4.0
Aug 26, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Lots of professional development support/resources for postdocs - Good number of social/networking events - Many recruiting events, you will definitely get a good job after a postdoc at MIT - Good 401k

Cons

- Salary is not good for the area and for the institution's caliber - Health insurance is expensive - Your specific experience will heavily depend on the lab you're in, so it can range from very good to very bad

2.0
Aug 24, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Interesting projects. * Generous sick time. * Excellent Blue Cross Blue Shield health insurance. * Inexpensive day time parking/ free nights/weekends parking. * Good parental leave. * Decent Delta dental insurance. * Generous expenses paid for business trips. * Senior scientists offer a wealth of knowledge and experience. * Many opportunities to travel for business trips around the world.

Cons

* Mass layoffs for the next few months (probably year) with only 2 weeks of notice. * Pressure for growth model. They put a lot of pressure on you and expect you to grow and learn quickly but burn out fast. Then they expect you to leave. (If they want you to leave, the scientists you work for start saying you aren't getting your work done and people treat you like garbage.) * Senior scientists have little to no interest in mentoring junior staff and new hires. You sink or swim on your own. REU students are coddled by comparison. * Principal investigators tend to waste/use funding for other purposes other than the work it was awarded to for years and then pressure you to finish the work with the remaining of the funding at the last minute. * Many scientists are there for the wrong reasons; They want to be famous, on T.V., and doing interviews. They don't care about the future of the fields they are in. * Not enough funding to funding fixing or replacing hardware that is over 15 years old that is used for scientific experiments on a daily basis. * Resistance to change and using modern technology. * Many scientists appear to be (legitimately) on the spectrum and have communication issues with typical individuals; These communication issues are not addressed. * Waste a lot of funding on sending scientists on expensive, week-long business trips where meals are comped up to $75 per meal per person. 3x per day. * Gossip, workplace slander. * "Boy's club" depending on the department or lab. I.e. secret golf club only male scientists are invited to. * DEI is performative and surface level after the recent election. The administration was cowed by recent events. * I have not met a single person that liked being a student here. * HR is ineffective and performative. * Sexual harassment and stalking are swept under the rug. * The administration prioritizes staying out of the headlines over protecting staff.

3.0
Aug 20, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive salary, great peers, good opportunities to learn, neat access to learn about the research

Cons

Leadership does not care about staff. They do not care about staff. They will grind their best employees into nothing, rather than take steps to retain good staff and make their lives easier. Middle-management often has their hands tied to help their teams, leadership does not listen to the middle management and does not balance the requests and needs of staff

Viewing 28 - 30 of 467 Reviews

Glassdoor has 4,842 MIT reviews submitted anonymously by MIT employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if MIT is right for you.