Merck Engineering Scientist Associate reviews

4.2

85% would recommend to a friend

(293 total reviews)
avatar

Rob Davis

91% approve of CEO

70% positive business outlook

Associate Scientist, Engineering employees have rated Merck with 4.2 out of 5 stars, based on 293 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Associate Scientist, Engineering professionals have an excellent working experience there. Merck is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Associate Scientist, Engineering professionals compared to other employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

293 reviews
4.0
May 20, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A lot of Flexibility, good balance

Cons

Career advancement can be hard

2.0
Apr 22, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work hours, some interesting projects, good colleagues, some small perks here and there.

Cons

Benefits becomes worse, management could be more competent and transparent, no carer advancements, rock bottom morale.

3.0
Mar 22, 2015

The "Old Merck" is gone

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Merck traditionally has had both good pay and good benefits. Because things change so much, you can work on different projects and learn new things.

Cons

The atmosphere is very political which can make it very difficult to get promoted. There has also been historically, and even more so now, a lot of change. You probably won't be with one manager for long. The current state is one of flux with more lay-offs in the works. Much lower job stability than in the past. Overall Merck used to be a pretty good place to work, but the "Old Merck" is gone for good I think, much more business oriented and less interested in developing new products and in good science.

Viewing 250 - 252 of 293 Reviews

Glassdoor has 8,190 Merck reviews submitted anonymously by Merck employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Merck is right for you.