Merck Engineering Scientist Associate reviews

4.2

85% would recommend to a friend

(293 total reviews)
avatar

Rob Davis

91% approve of CEO

70% positive business outlook

Associate Scientist, Engineering employees have rated Merck with 4.2 out of 5 stars, based on 293 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Associate Scientist, Engineering professionals have an excellent working experience there. Merck is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Associate Scientist, Engineering professionals compared to other employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

293 reviews
3.0
Nov 19, 2011

Great!

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Amazing atmosphere, opportunity for growth, great collegiality, smart co-workers and respectable benefits like health, vision and dental. Paid vacation hours.

Cons

Long hours, tough work-family time balance, lack of leadership and constant need to multi-task to meet deadlines. Management need to communicate better.

4.0
Mar 30, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great salary, convenient location, good atmoshpere

Cons

Take over target, patent expiration

1.0
Mar 1, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work schedule Still a lot of highly talented scientists

Cons

Upper management no longer treats its employees with dignity; it treats them like a commodity. No investment in employees' skills--the first thing they cut when profits slide is the training budget. No opportunity for advancement unless you have the right connections. Workload is incredibly high and the scientific staff is stretched to the breaking point.

Viewing 283 - 285 of 293 Reviews

Glassdoor has 8,188 Merck reviews submitted anonymously by Merck employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Merck is right for you.