NASA reviews

4.4

86% would recommend to a friend

(270 total reviews)
avatar

Charles F. Bolden, Jr.

83% approve of CEO

61% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

270 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
5.0
May 20, 2016

Project Coordinator

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Completely professional staff, collegial atmosphere and work that impacts the world - our Earth, humanity and everything that lives on it, in a very real way. Easy time management, dedicated colleagues Smart, well educated group of people working for peanuts when they could literally cross the street and get quadruple pay and outlandish benefits. But this work is WAY more important than 98% of what happens in the valley, and the people who do it, know it. Really refreshing place to be.

Cons

Best government job ever, but still a government job. None of the SV perks, lower pay, too much paper work for normal activities.

3.0
Apr 2, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The NASA brand is recognized worldwide. The agency has a great PR machine that advertises the work being done. People will stop you and thank you for what you're doing. Outreach through NASA is fun and rewarding because it ignites the imagination of explorers of all demographics. Lots of development programs and still some good engineers and leaders present that want to mentor and help their employees grow. If you just want to do research and don't mind not having a clear path to have your research turn into technologies that could be incorporated on missions, it's a good place to explore your ideas. NASA is still the leader in driving the direction of the aerospace industry (though that seems to be shifting lately). As an employee you'll have the opportunity to see what's going on across the agency and in industry. Work life balance can be reasonable. Some members of senior management are waking up to the systemic problems and trying to change for the better.

Cons

The can-do attitude of the past is waning. People are afraid to take risks. Major programs that are failing are taking funding away from the technological investments that are needed to take us further into the solar system or advance scientific discovery. No one wants to stand up and say that the programs are failing because they're afraid of upsetting congressional constituents. NASA is a bait and switch. Advertisements and recruiting info say NASA is doing all these incredible missions and technology development. What they really should say is NASA is buying these incredible missions and technology development. This works for some people. If you're ok with exploring concepts that likely will never go beyond concept stage, work at NASA. If you're ok with writing requirements and then watching prime contractors do the design and development work from the periphery, work at NASA. If you want to contribute your own ideas, see them come to life and fly in space, don't work at NASA. Those opportunities are sparse if not non existent. So much inertia in the very aged workforce that most efforts to do things differently and more efficiently will likely be squashed or the people trying to do things better will get burnt out and leave. There is no incentive for dealing with poor performers. If you're in a PR, outreach, administrative or oversight role, morale is great. If you're in a technical position, morale is not as great.

4.0
Feb 13, 2016

research scientist

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good enviormen, nice pay and light load

Cons

too much presure on project

Viewing 247 - 249 of 270 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,252 NASA reviews submitted anonymously by NASA employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if NASA is right for you.