employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

National Instruments

Is this your company?

National Instruments reviews

3.7

68% would recommend to a friend

(720 total reviews)

Alex Davern

62% approve of CEO

46% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

720 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
1.0
Aug 8, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friends. Work life balance as they claim but you can have same flexibility in lot of other companies in Austin

Cons

Salary, they hire lot of students straight out of college paying them 20-30% less than what they can get in other companies. Biased managers : employees are rated not by their performance at work but by the number of parties you attend with your team and managers. In many teams in IT your managers wont assign you any work until you ask for it, but they rate you based on nothing during yearly review.

2.0
Aug 2, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

// Great people. Colleagues and mentors are technically gifted and generally very willing to invest in the career development of new hires. Most employees are genuinely motivated to develop/market/sell/support quality products that will promote customer success in industry. // Wonderful day-to-day work culture. Direct management tends to be hands-off, allowing sufficient professional autonomy where appropriate. Most teams work well together (see 'Great people'), and there's a huge social aspect to the culture (pretty common in Austin, where tech workforces are largely made up of young professionals and recent grads). Weekly happy hours in the workplace are encouraged, and programs exist for intramural sports, after-hours gaming, maker/hobbyist projects, etc. Networking around common interests both inside and outside of work is super easy. Dress code is nonexistent, except when interfacing directly with customers. // Decent investment benefits. 401k matching is better than any of my friends/family have ever had. Employee stock purchase plan provides a significant discount on company shares. // Awesome campus. Large undeveloped/natural space with trails, volleyball and basketball courts, and a large deck/courtyard with a grill. Modern buildings with quality facilities are well-decorated and decently furnished. // Exciting location. Living in Austin is an amazing experience for just about anyone.

Cons

// Salaries are generally disappointing. Performance bonuses have become increasingly rare. Profit sharing varies (naturally), but the deposit has hardly been worth the trip to the bank, the past few years. // Insurance benefits are also on the decline, especially under the convenient cover of healthcare policy changes. // Upper management is disconnected from the ground floor. (Read literally, I actually run into them all the time on the elevator or in the cafeteria -- which is kind of cool -- but it's not as if they're typically interested in having a serious conversation with a grunt like me, regardless of how long or short.) All focus is now on the bottom line and shareholder success. Employee satisfaction is measured by results of corporate surveys given annually to a random collection of execs, directors, managers, engineers, technicians, and admins or by exec-led 'initiatives' that result in more useless internal surveys and endless 'data collection'. Very weak response to poor survey results has left me further disappointed in upper management's interest in employee success or happiness. The same feedback regarding salary and benefits is given over and over again, through avenues like those 'initiatives', communication with direct management during performance reviews, and Glassdoor reviews, yet the response is always free t-shirts, an extra beer on the house during a company happy hour, or renting out an amusement park 100 miles out of town on a Sunday (which apparently used to be an annual tradition that fell off a few years ago). Personally, I'd much rather do away with all this nonsense in favor of having a couple of deserving colleagues get a legitimate raise. // Work-life balance varies from department to department and from team to team, but across the board, groups are being asked to do more with less. Rising attrition rates are resulting in lost knowledge/expertise, which isn't helping. Not all of those positions left open are being filled, in efforts to cut costs, so workloads are generally increasing, and deadlines/schedules/expectations are not adjusting accordingly. Direct management understands and empathizes but has no authority to effect change -- only to respond with empty praise and patronizing positivity. // Even though the people are great (see 'Great people' under Pros), their frequent grumbling/venting is the staple of our very poor morale. It's not easy to get motivated in an atmosphere so jaded. // Sometimes, the elevators take forever. (Could be a Pro, I suppose, if you're health-conscious and willing to take the stairs.)

4.0
Jul 31, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people there were very good. Smart, pragmatic, and they wanted to actually do things. Easy to work with for the most part and wanted the best idea to win.

Cons

Too collaborative. Management were not the best at ensuring a focused path. Many good people would leave because the salary or type of work were not what they could have at other companies.

Viewing 496 - 498 of 720 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,927 National Instruments reviews submitted anonymously by National Instruments employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if National Instruments is right for you.