Oracle reviews

3.4

58% would recommend to a friend

(60,125 total reviews)

Clay Magouyrk and Mike Sicilia

41% approve of CEO

54% positive business outlook

Oracle has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 60,125 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Oracle employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

60K reviews
1.0
Jul 26, 2013

Career Killer

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible workhours, Good benefits, Some very capable and pleasant foreign employees trapped at Oracle due to visa/greencard issues.

Cons

Everything Else. Management is clueless about even most fundamental facts about the marketplace, and this informs their complete lack of strategic direction. Communications with mid/senior mgmt are limited to nasty dictates on impossible deadlines with no upward flow of information. Direction turns on a dime and years of effort by many people are just thrown out the window without any accountability by the "leadership". In few cases where game-changing innovations are proposed (that entail little cost) mgmt doesn't even understand them! Direction for 7 years has been to deliver SaaS business aps, but no one ever thought of the infrastructural components required or how the internal processes would need to change. Now that the s#$% is hitting the fan mgmt's solution is to demand more work within the same impossible delivery schedule. Bottom line is that mgmt is a net value subtract. We would be better off with self-managing teams. ZERO, ZERO, ZERO compensation or career growth. In the very rare cases of promotions (maybe 3 out of hundreds of people in 7 years???) there is no increase in compensation. No or trivial increases and bonuses for anyone I know for the past 5 years. Any time someone leaves in the US they are either not replaced (and rest of the team has to pick up the workload, or they are replaced by somone in India. Workload is very high, deadlines are very aggressive. No one cares that the dev environments or tools needed to do the job are unavailable. Demands are to close bugs not to fix the root causes. Dev environments are so unstable that efficiency is minimal. PMs can be responsible for aps for which they don't even have working environments to use. Acronyms are rampant and no one knows what half of them mean. There is no onboarding training of new people and no way to find out half of what you need to do your job. People with 10 yrs of tenure still don't know basic things about how related processes work. There are no internal resources for finding out who to talk to about a particular product or tool or internal business process that is critical to your job. Instead lots of people just use do an email blitz (ie. 'spam') asking questions which results in only the most fragmentary knowledge transfer. Many teams are dominated by legacy folks that view the status quo, 80s style enterprise software as the ideal and resist any innovation. Much of the software designs are patterned on 30 yo approaches. Many PM, Strategy and DEV personnel seem oblivious to the innovations happening right down the road from them. Going to work is like going back in time, except that now the workforce is 60% Indian. Nothing has changed but the demographics...

2.0
Jul 19, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Large, stable company with good history of making a profit thanks to Larry Ellison

Cons

Austin management is very out of touch with realities of development and realistic goals for processors, stay away from Austin location unless you are good at playing politics

2.0
Jun 19, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong independent intelligent people. You learn how to do almost everything because you are on your own and the entire model is self service to the extreme.

Cons

Commision checks for sales staff are held for months as Oracle says they don't have enough people in that department to process the checks on time due to the high number of transactions. In actuallity they get interest withholding money from the sales staff and they don't value their sales staff so why pay them? The latest is to only pay commision on some but not all deals, Oracle is cutting the amount support sales reps get paid on up to 75% if it falls into certain deal categories, they still expect sales reps to close these deals just not get paid for them. They expect their sales staff to work harder while taking this sneaky paycut. The message from management is "Just be happy you have a job" and "if you don't like it leave". Sales managers still get paid on time (and at a different rate). It's very difficult to get employees to take responsiblity for projects that go to multiple departments. It is not a work together environment. It's the strongest solider reaps the greatest reward. Everyone is out for themselves. Nice people do not last at Oracle. The company is divided up by the acquisitions and a lot of employees identify themselves by the legacy company they were hired by (x-sun, x-hyperion, x-peoplesoft). Upper management blames sales staff for losses and does not acknowledge that they don't train sales staff, provide inadequate internal tools, canabalize sales staff with Saas sales, have let go or lost seasoned sales staff to competitors and do not meet promises to customers about fusion and product upgrades. They also don't empower their sales staff and require them to fill out endless forms and get approvals for the simplest requests. Managers also don't allow employees to log overtime and harass or put employees on notice if they log overtime. They never give raises either, not even cost of living raises.

Viewing 736 - 738 of 60,125 Reviews

Glassdoor has 66,507 Oracle reviews submitted anonymously by Oracle employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Oracle is right for you.