Oxford University Press reviews

3.4

57% would recommend to a friend

(1,230 total reviews)
avatar

Nigel Portwood

53% approve of CEO

35% positive business outlook

Oxford University Press has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 1,230 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Oxford University Press employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
2.0
Aug 28, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people: OUP hires so many hardworking, passionate, driven people. You will make great connections that last even when those people leave the company. OUP has a high employee turnover, so it's a great place to get that first publishing job. They have to replace people so often that it's a good place to find open positions. Turnover also causes a lot of assistants and coordinators to do work that is well above their job responsibilities. You will gain experience that can help you find a new job at a company that takes better care of their employees. Lots of happy hours since everyone quits!

Cons

OUP will teach you the hard lesson that the company you work for does not care about you. Your workload, work/life balance, mental health, career progression--none of that matters to senior management. Oxford will inevitably make you feel like you deserve to be mistreated, under payed, overworked. Be sure to leave before you start accepting the blatant corporate abuse that is tolerated in the office.

1.0
Mar 5, 2019

admin purgatory

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Form bonds with coworkers -Occasionally get to work with authors you like if you're lucky -Free bagels

Cons

WHAT I THOUGHT THIS JOB WOULD BE LIKE: when i graduated college with my humanities degree, like many people, i believed that becoming an editorial assistant was the most appropriate non-grad school decision i could make. while i knew there would be a lot of grunt work, i believed that being around such prominent editors and authors would inevitably expose me to interesting opportunities and connections. WHAT IT ACTUALLY WAS: you’re basically working in a dysfunctional, never-ending admin mill. while you may get opportunities to do some editorial-ish tasks, most managers will get annoyed if you at all prioritize these things over the mountain of admin work on your desk, which is literally unavoidable because that mountain is perpetually re-spawning itself. WHY IS THIS JOB TERRIBLE: in my opinion, OUP prefers to pay an army of smart, eager college grads (most women) $35,000-ish a year to troubleshoot all of their egregious technology and workflow problems day in and day out rather than actually invest in R&D. i’m not going to speak for all EAs, but i think a majority of us felt like we were being forced to roll a boulder up a hill every day. everyone admits that the systems are utterly illogical and outdated, but fewer will recognize that their burden fell mostly on the entry-level and/or lowest paid workers. IF YOU STILL CHOOSE TO DO IT: have an EXIT strategy. this job isn’t going to help open as many doors as you think it will. know what you want this position to do for you and where you’ll go after. don’t expect this job to answer that question for you. if you stay for too long (in most cases more than a year), you likely will get so burnt out that it will become even harder to leave, so make that promise to yourself right from the start. oh and by the way they hope that AE promotion they vaguely dangle in front of you after a year will stop you from doing that. in my opinion, it’s not worth it, and could actually make you seem overqualified for better EA jobs at other presses, if that’s what you decide to go for. IN CONCLUSION: love yourself. explore your options. know your worth!!!

avatar
Oxford University Press Response
7y
We’re really sorry you didn’t enjoy your time at OUP and didn’t feel valued enough in your role. We are actively investing in our technology and systems to try to reduce the amount of admin work involved and increase the more substantive and enjoyable aspects of this type of role. We wish you all the best in your progression going forward, and if you would like to talk to us about your time here you can reach us confidentially at glassdoor@oup.com
1.0
May 24, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people. Many strive to produce great work despite relentless obstacles from management and IT failures.

Cons

OUP is completely toxic. Staff are treated as disposable, and turnover is constant. The company has gone through so many rounds of layoffs and restructures that current staff are still dealing with the effects. Meanwhile, hiring freezes make it impossible to manage workloads as more people flee. The brunt of the workload is pushed down onto assistants and lower level staff, many of whom are doing the work of 3-4 people. Unpaid overtime is rampant among non-exempt employees and enforced by managers. Stress levels are at a constant high. I worked with a team of lovely people who rarely interacted with each other because their workloads were so precarious. Many people never took lunch breaks. Sexual harassment is a serious problem here. I faced harassment from another employee (with a history of harassment complaints against them). When I alerted my manager, nothing changed. I was put into the same situation with them repeatedly, despite providing documentation and other staff members coming forward. The harassment did not stop until the employee was promoted. To OUP's managers, perhaps this was an acceptable cost of doing business. To me, this was a time of terrible stress that began to manifest in other health problems. OUP runs on outdated technology that is literally painful to use. Their budget cuts made it impossible to work at times. Basic needs (a mouse with a working right-click button, software listed in my job description) were denied to me citing lack of budget. (How demoralizing do you think it is to have to build a case and put in multiple requests for a mouse? Do you want to find out?) When a company is counting paperclips, you know things are bad. The entire business regularly loses email and Internet for hours at a time. Once again, the brunt of this is pushed onto assistants, who are expected to navigate these problems and lack of infrastructure every day. Another of many reasons this company makes people burn out. In the end, I left because I felt this company was making too many unacceptable compromises. My job increasingly involved putting out embarrassing and avoidable fires (delayed publications, quality assurance mishaps, failing to pay authors), and all of this while dealing with other serious challenges (toxic work environment, constant pressure from management, lack of IT support, and byzantine company structure meaning no one is accountable). I took a job at a nonprofit publisher because I wanted a job in publishing, and I believed in its mission. If you cannot advance, and you cannot even take pride in your work, then what is left? OUP may be kept alive because of its prestigious name. Yet OUP today is a company with no vision, making unacceptable compromises, whose talent is leaving. I do not recommend working with them, as an employee, contractor, or customer.

avatar
Oxford University Press Response
7y
Hello. I’m the Managing Director of the Academic Division at OUP, responsible for many of the staff in our New York office. I was saddened to read your note and to hear about your experience working for OUP in New York. OUP’s Investigations Manager responds to the types of concerns your raised. We take all reports seriously and do not tolerate any form of harassment at OUP, so if you have witnessed any unethical behaviour I urge you to please report it confidentially via investigations@oup.com or through our external hotline SpeakUpoup@expolink.co.uk and give as much specific information as you can to help us to investigate it. Thank you in advance. On your feedback around technology at OUP, we are making large investments to improve the technology used by our staff, and simplify our processes. While that won’t happen overnight, we are making a difference and hope to see real improvements over the coming months. I would also like to assure you that we are reviewing your points relating to salary and workloads. OUP is a mission-led organization full of people proud of the contribution that we make to scholarship and education, which is why it is so disappointing to hear of your experience. Please do consider contacting OUP’s Investigations Manager directly or through the Speak Up service. David
Viewing 13 - 15 of 1,230 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,503 Oxford University Press reviews submitted anonymously by Oxford University Press employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Oxford University Press is right for you.