PLOS reviews

3.1

49% would recommend to a friend

(4 total reviews)

Alison Mudditt

72% approve of CEO

38% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

4 reviews

Reviews about "Diversity & Inclusion"

Return to all reviews
1.0
Jul 8, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

*Meaningful mission *Weekly happy hours or lunches *Great co-workers *Good benefits *Fantastic waterfront location

Cons

*Getting rid of the good people during the many layoffs and restructures which results in working more than 40 hours/week *Highly paid executives but those doing all the work are under compensated (take a look at the salaries on the 990s posted on PLOS' website) *Low moral and nothing is being done about it *The CEO lets us know that she hires her friends from UC Press so you can see definitely favoritism on the exec team (all while she stands at All Hands that as much as we like referrals, we don't want them so we can bring in diversity and fresh perspective) *Under appreciated and not acknowledged for hard work *PLOS is in a financial crisis yet they're spending tons of money on coaches for the executives and senior management

2.0
Sep 22, 2018

"Culture Fit"

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I know what it's like to be frustrated trying to access scholarly articles and resources that are locked behind paywalls you can't afford. There is definitely a place for democratizing publishers like PLOS ONE, and, while there are finer points to be made about the pay-to-publish model, the overall mission is a worthwhile one. The workload for publication assistants in particular is overextending, but there is no expectation for you to work past your allotted hours for the day. The company fixes up weekly, in-house "happy hours," which are quite generous. There are some good opportunities for projects if you can manage the time for it.

Cons

Publications assistants on PLOS ONE really bust their chops and there is lots of turnover because it is just not sustainable. I just want to make an important note about how the company hires and promotes based primarily on "culture fit." This puts a premium on Western ideals like extraversion, culturally-insensitive ideas of good worker and leadership traits, and the unchecked personal discretion of managers and social cliques within the office. PLOS is a prime example of "culture fit" becoming discriminatory in nature. By now they are well-known for promoting pretty horribly, and you can read past reviews to get an idea of this. In this part of the country, no one is explicitly racist or even intends to be, but if your ability to mesh with predominantly white managers or social groups and exhibit Western-centric leadership traits is what gets you appreciated or promoted, then this kind of working climate, like so many, are simply favorable to those who are predisposed to it, as in highly favorable to white people cut from a certain cloth or background and those that 'hack' it. "Soft" racism if you will. Just read about all the literature that's come up about "culture fit" becoming another subtle form of racism and discrimination. It's a ceiling that exists for so many people of color, as well as those who don't readily fit the traits valued in individualistic, capitalist culture. There are many well-meaning people who, whether they know it or not, reinforce the status quo. PLOS company culture is a really good example of these things at play. I am grateful for the time I had here, even made some nice work buddies, but this point definitely needs to be made. In these times especially, there is no need to mince words when it comes to things like this. We should all be calling it out when we see it.

2.0
Mar 4, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Good Work/Life Balance -Great Mission, with some great and driven people that strive to keep this mission alive -Happy Hour every Friday (Wifri) -Busy, but you do learn a great deal in a short period of time -Casual/informal attire -Great place if you are fresh out of college, and need to kick start your career/gain experience -There are some genuine people here that work hard, and want to see their department/journal/company succeed and excel. -The CEO, Richard, seems motivated to change the company for the better. He also appears to care about the opinions of his employees, and has regular office hours so that anyone can drop by and voice their concerns to him directly.

Cons

Management: Firstly, I strongly agree with many of the past and most recent reviews regarding the management here at PLOS. Management appears to be unequipped to deal with multiple employees and conflicts that arise on the team. There seems to be this unspoken understanding when hiring managers/promoting people that as long as the candidate has worked at PLOS, and the candidate is friends with those who are interviewing him/her, then that candidate should be hired or promoted. There appears to be no logical reason as to why people get promoted into far more challenging roles that they truly weren’t ready for. A lot of these managers are super young, inexperienced, and have not had any prior management training or mentor-ship. They are just thrown into the job, and fumble around incessantly. These managers do not truly have a grasp on the workflows and processes of the journal they now manage/oversee, and as a result, poor decisions are made. Culture: On the surface, everyone smiles and appear to be friendly. However, as time passes, you will understand that this place is exactly like high school: a place consisting of loud, and obnoxious people, cliques, gossip (some of the gossip/rumors are started by the managers themselves!), and decisions/promotions driven on popularity, not merit/hard work. If you are a part of these cliques, then congratulations, expect to excel through the ranks no matter how sub-par your work is! There is this vague, almost non-existent line between management/employee relationships, which clearly creates situations of favoritism. Many of these managers are a part of these cliques, and promote/give praise to who they like, not who actually deserved the promotion. Good people get passed up, and bad employees excel, which definitely leads to an increase in turn-over. Also, I believe that the workplace should remain as a neutral environment when it comes to politics (and religion as well). Regardless of whom you support or what you believe, you should not shove your political viewpoints down other people’s throats. Though I personally did not like the outcome of our presidential election, I don’t need to make public statements at work like “If people voted for [insert name here], then they are idiots”! We as American citizens have the right to vote for whomever we see fit for POTUS, and creating a politically charged atmosphere at work causes division, alienation, and toxicity in the workplace. Whether I agree with people’s political views or not, people need to keep their political views to themselves while at work, and focus on actual WORK and learning their roles.

avatar
PLOS Response
9y
I would love to chat with you in person to learn more about your perspective. PLOS's HR Director, Katie, is back from maternity leave and she has plans to expand the management training program that was started last year which hopefully addresses many of your concerns. I know it is PLOS's goal to provide a comfortable and productive work environment, so thank you for bringing your concerns to our attention. --Mariah HR
Viewing 1 - 3 of 4 Reviews

Glassdoor has 124 PLOS reviews submitted anonymously by PLOS employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if PLOS is right for you.