PLOS reviews

3.1

49% would recommend to a friend

(14 total reviews)

Alison Mudditt

72% approve of CEO

38% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

14 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
1.0
Jul 8, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

*Meaningful mission *Weekly happy hours or lunches *Great co-workers *Good benefits *Fantastic waterfront location

Cons

*Getting rid of the good people during the many layoffs and restructures which results in working more than 40 hours/week *Highly paid executives but those doing all the work are under compensated (take a look at the salaries on the 990s posted on PLOS' website) *Low moral and nothing is being done about it *The CEO lets us know that she hires her friends from UC Press so you can see definitely favoritism on the exec team (all while she stands at All Hands that as much as we like referrals, we don't want them so we can bring in diversity and fresh perspective) *Under appreciated and not acknowledged for hard work *PLOS is in a financial crisis yet they're spending tons of money on coaches for the executives and senior management

2.0
Mar 4, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Good Work/Life Balance -Great Mission, with some great and driven people that strive to keep this mission alive -Happy Hour every Friday (Wifri) -Busy, but you do learn a great deal in a short period of time -Casual/informal attire -Great place if you are fresh out of college, and need to kick start your career/gain experience -There are some genuine people here that work hard, and want to see their department/journal/company succeed and excel. -The CEO, Richard, seems motivated to change the company for the better. He also appears to care about the opinions of his employees, and has regular office hours so that anyone can drop by and voice their concerns to him directly.

Cons

Management: Firstly, I strongly agree with many of the past and most recent reviews regarding the management here at PLOS. Management appears to be unequipped to deal with multiple employees and conflicts that arise on the team. There seems to be this unspoken understanding when hiring managers/promoting people that as long as the candidate has worked at PLOS, and the candidate is friends with those who are interviewing him/her, then that candidate should be hired or promoted. There appears to be no logical reason as to why people get promoted into far more challenging roles that they truly weren’t ready for. A lot of these managers are super young, inexperienced, and have not had any prior management training or mentor-ship. They are just thrown into the job, and fumble around incessantly. These managers do not truly have a grasp on the workflows and processes of the journal they now manage/oversee, and as a result, poor decisions are made. Culture: On the surface, everyone smiles and appear to be friendly. However, as time passes, you will understand that this place is exactly like high school: a place consisting of loud, and obnoxious people, cliques, gossip (some of the gossip/rumors are started by the managers themselves!), and decisions/promotions driven on popularity, not merit/hard work. If you are a part of these cliques, then congratulations, expect to excel through the ranks no matter how sub-par your work is! There is this vague, almost non-existent line between management/employee relationships, which clearly creates situations of favoritism. Many of these managers are a part of these cliques, and promote/give praise to who they like, not who actually deserved the promotion. Good people get passed up, and bad employees excel, which definitely leads to an increase in turn-over. Also, I believe that the workplace should remain as a neutral environment when it comes to politics (and religion as well). Regardless of whom you support or what you believe, you should not shove your political viewpoints down other people’s throats. Though I personally did not like the outcome of our presidential election, I don’t need to make public statements at work like “If people voted for [insert name here], then they are idiots”! We as American citizens have the right to vote for whomever we see fit for POTUS, and creating a politically charged atmosphere at work causes division, alienation, and toxicity in the workplace. Whether I agree with people’s political views or not, people need to keep their political views to themselves while at work, and focus on actual WORK and learning their roles.

avatar
PLOS Response
9y
I would love to chat with you in person to learn more about your perspective. PLOS's HR Director, Katie, is back from maternity leave and she has plans to expand the management training program that was started last year which hopefully addresses many of your concerns. I know it is PLOS's goal to provide a comfortable and productive work environment, so thank you for bringing your concerns to our attention. --Mariah HR
1.0
Feb 6, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

We have a happy hour every Friday and a generous benefits package. Expect a 40 hour workweek, 3 weeks of vacation and a good work/life balance. The atmosphere is friendly with a casual dress code. Departments are highly stratified and each has their own culture, some better than others.

Cons

If you like low wages and office politics, PLOS is your place. At face value, people are friendly- however, once you try to advance in the company, be aware that PLOS is not a meritocracy and the biases, misogyny, and incompetence of the hiring managers will keep anyone who excels at their job down while unthreatening, yet mediocre employees will rise through the ranks. Hiring and promotion decisions appear arbitrary and/or personality based and it doesn't appear that anyone at PLOS knows how to assess a resume or cover letter with regard to a job description. PLOS celebrates mediocrity which explains why they’ve lost some of their best brains over the past year or so. Human Resources has been a revolving door for the past 18 months, so there is no one with both the knowledge and authority to provide oversight or training to poor managers. Wages are low and management has trouble hiring qualified people at starting salaries. From a broader perspective, there is a very top-down approach to communication and decision makers rarely seek out the knowledge and perspectives from people on the ground. The deciders are extremely wedded to their methods and procedures, even when they don’t work and don’t know what they don’t know. Supervisors are given immense responsibility with little training or structure, and many lack competence in dealing with personnel issues, resolving conflicts, or developing staff. In terms of advancement, there isn't much opportunity despite high turnover due to organizational structure. Other than our current CEO, management is so out of touch with the day-to-day operations as well as office culture- they have no idea who the toxic people are that are destroying the morale of entire departments via incompetence and inexcusable bias.

avatar
PLOS Response
9y
Hi. Thank you for your candor. If you are comfortable doing so, I would really like to meet with you in person to learn more about your experience at PLOS to hear more about what we can learn and change to make improvements. --Mariah, HR
Viewing 7 - 9 of 14 Reviews

Glassdoor has 124 PLOS reviews submitted anonymously by PLOS employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if PLOS is right for you.