PLOS reviews

3.1

49% would recommend to a friend

(113 total reviews)

Alison Mudditt

72% approve of CEO

38% positive business outlook

PLOS has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 113 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The PLOS employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

113 reviews
2.0
Mar 4, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Good Work/Life Balance -Great Mission, with some great and driven people that strive to keep this mission alive -Happy Hour every Friday (Wifri) -Busy, but you do learn a great deal in a short period of time -Casual/informal attire -Great place if you are fresh out of college, and need to kick start your career/gain experience -There are some genuine people here that work hard, and want to see their department/journal/company succeed and excel. -The CEO, Richard, seems motivated to change the company for the better. He also appears to care about the opinions of his employees, and has regular office hours so that anyone can drop by and voice their concerns to him directly.

Cons

Management: Firstly, I strongly agree with many of the past and most recent reviews regarding the management here at PLOS. Management appears to be unequipped to deal with multiple employees and conflicts that arise on the team. There seems to be this unspoken understanding when hiring managers/promoting people that as long as the candidate has worked at PLOS, and the candidate is friends with those who are interviewing him/her, then that candidate should be hired or promoted. There appears to be no logical reason as to why people get promoted into far more challenging roles that they truly weren’t ready for. A lot of these managers are super young, inexperienced, and have not had any prior management training or mentor-ship. They are just thrown into the job, and fumble around incessantly. These managers do not truly have a grasp on the workflows and processes of the journal they now manage/oversee, and as a result, poor decisions are made. Culture: On the surface, everyone smiles and appear to be friendly. However, as time passes, you will understand that this place is exactly like high school: a place consisting of loud, and obnoxious people, cliques, gossip (some of the gossip/rumors are started by the managers themselves!), and decisions/promotions driven on popularity, not merit/hard work. If you are a part of these cliques, then congratulations, expect to excel through the ranks no matter how sub-par your work is! There is this vague, almost non-existent line between management/employee relationships, which clearly creates situations of favoritism. Many of these managers are a part of these cliques, and promote/give praise to who they like, not who actually deserved the promotion. Good people get passed up, and bad employees excel, which definitely leads to an increase in turn-over. Also, I believe that the workplace should remain as a neutral environment when it comes to politics (and religion as well). Regardless of whom you support or what you believe, you should not shove your political viewpoints down other people’s throats. Though I personally did not like the outcome of our presidential election, I don’t need to make public statements at work like “If people voted for [insert name here], then they are idiots”! We as American citizens have the right to vote for whomever we see fit for POTUS, and creating a politically charged atmosphere at work causes division, alienation, and toxicity in the workplace. Whether I agree with people’s political views or not, people need to keep their political views to themselves while at work, and focus on actual WORK and learning their roles.

avatar
PLOS Response
9y
I would love to chat with you in person to learn more about your perspective. PLOS's HR Director, Katie, is back from maternity leave and she has plans to expand the management training program that was started last year which hopefully addresses many of your concerns. I know it is PLOS's goal to provide a comfortable and productive work environment, so thank you for bringing your concerns to our attention. --Mariah HR
2.0
Jan 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

PLOS has done some amazing things for science communication and Open Access. PLOS really was revolutionary 10 years ago, and it has done well as a first-mover. Now that there is a ton of competition from all sides, PLOS has to continue to innovate to maintain its leadership position - some significant challenges for the organization ahead. The people at PLOS are what make working there great, *most* everyone works really hard and cares about the work they do. Some of the benefits are good, like 401k matching and bonuses for salaried employees, office treats and outings, etc.

Cons

Politically Toxic Environment PLOS really suffers from its politically poisoned management environment. Petty territorial disagreements and departments not working together or event talking to one another. This is primarily at the C- and director levels, making everyone else wonder why some important projects never get done. Very frustrating. And this was how it was before the new CEO and CFO arrived. When they got to PLOS, a couple of terrible obstinate useless managers were soon fired, and this was great and overdue. But it's added a sense of fear to the already divisive work culture - people fearing for their jobs fight harder to maintain control and power. It really gets in the way of the innovative ideas that PLOS needs to execute on. The Haves and Have-Nots There is a legion of underpaid, undervalued junior staff working diligently every day at PLOS. They are paid hourly, and I have no idea how they can afford to live on this in San Francisco, the most expensive city in the country and possibly world. These are some of the best, brightest and highly eager people in the organization. It is totally unfair that they have to punch the clock, dreaming of getting that token promotion to a salaried job. But the big example of disparity is the PTO. Management gets six weeks paid vacation, while everyone else only gets 2-3 weeks! It's PLOS' dirty little secret that everybody knows (or should know!) about. This is NOT a good way to compensate your senior people, it causes poor morale among everyone else. HR has been promising for a couple of years (or so) to do a comprehensive analysis of compensation of PLOS compared with similar companies in the SF Bay Area and greater scientific publishing world, and this might be a way to bring people up to a fair compensation level (like boosting everyone $20k). I'll just keep holding my breath on this one, while I continue to watch good people leave for better pay and opportunity out there in the booming SF market. They Won't Listen PLOS has grown into a stifling corporate environment. Upper management doesn't listen to what is being said by the many people below them. This is where some of the best ideas come from! But if you speak up or out of line, you risk getting smacked down. They even took the anonymous suggestion box away!

2.0
Jul 9, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They hire good smart people out of college, vendors are crap.

Cons

Worst middle management, bad bumbling decisions. Engineers don't listen to designers, researchers, or production team. All around mess. Cambridge office is a total joke.

Viewing 7 - 9 of 113 Reviews

Glassdoor has 124 PLOS reviews submitted anonymously by PLOS employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if PLOS is right for you.