It's been a downward spiral ever since the merger. The PSCU culture is overlaid with what seems like autocratic management (from "the other company").
No transparency, no freedom to express opinion, asked to "toe the line" on all decisions made by "the other company's" leadership, lip-service to collaboration, no participation (for legacy PSCU) at lower and mid-levels of management in decision making. "The other company's" leadership is seen promoting their own ilk regardless of completeness of vision, skillset and leadership capabilities. Their leadership is a average at best and sad at worst. Their plans seem devoid of realism and sound more like advertising brochure of tools they currently use. The most irrational thing is, this "other company's" leadership has been given keys to the kingdom and their grandiose claims are being thought of as being achievable while those who have toiled (with whatever budget was made available) to deliver a "complete" solution are being moved out (either voluntarily or involuntarily).
The most worrying aspect, instead of adopting what made legacy PSCU successful and filling in the gaps with solutions from "the other company", it has gone the other direction, and we have adopted major technology and even process direction from "the other company". Another mind-boggling thing - even the HR leadership is from "the other company" and there seems to be a no respite on the autocracy that has set in.
Just for reference legacy PSCU was gaining business at the expense of this "other company" in the marketplace due to legacy PSCU's better solutions and overall experience.
