Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Pearson

      Engaged Employer

      Pearson Associate Editor reviews

      3.2

      44% would recommend to a friend

      (83 total reviews)
      avatar

      Omar Abbosh

      18% approve of CEO

      42% positive business outlook

      Ratings by category

      3.5

      Diversity & inclusion

      3.4

      Work/Life balance

      3.1

      Culture & values

      3.1

      Compensation and benefits

      2.9

      Senior management

      2.8

      Career opportunities

      Associate Editor employees have rated Pearson with 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 83 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Associate Editor professionals have a good working experience there. Pearson is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Associate Editor professionals compared to other employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.7 stars).

      Ratings by demographic groups

      Reviews by job title

      83 reviews
      3.0
      Oct 30, 2012

      The leader in educational publishing, but doesn't seem to be moving fast enough in today's world

      Senior editor
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Pretty lax on vacation Great products, especially compared to competition If you seek out good mentors, you can find them Industry leader

      Cons

      Too big...decisions take a very long time Slow to move from analog to digital, although trying No office "perks" Low Pay, or perhaps pay division (my direct reports made pennies and I felt horrible about it) I was promoted relatively fast, but many in my division went 3-4 years with no promotion

      2.0
      Sep 26, 2012

      Always learning... but always blaming

      Editor
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Great colleagues (honestly!), great new polished office building. 200MYR for dental or optical insurance claim per year, 1 month bonus fixed every year + global bonus (based on global profits) + KPI bonus.

      Cons

      No HR hired for months, too emotional managers, ineffective language and editorial training Frequently changing and confusing workflow. Never put the burden and blame to the editors. My team were heavily burdened with lots of titles, and editors keep quitting, without quick replacement. Too many ad hoc decision

      Viewing 67 - 69 of 83 Reviews
      Related searches: Pearson Associate Editor jobs | Pearson Associate Editor salaries | Pearson benefits | Pearson Associate Editor interviews | Pearson conversations
      Pearson reviewsPearson Associate Editor reviews

      Glassdoor has 9,542 Pearson reviews submitted anonymously by Pearson employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pearson is right for you.