Pearson Project Editor reviews

3.2

40% would recommend to a friend

(72 total reviews)
avatar

Omar Abbosh

8% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

Project Editor employees have rated Pearson with 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 72 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Project Editor professionals have a good working experience there. Pearson is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Project Editor professionals compared to other employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

72 reviews
4.0
Feb 18, 2013

Great workmates and team

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people you work with are true team players and generally get along really well. You have to work with people from lots of different departments on projects and I feel like the good friendly working culture there enables the success of this.

Cons

The company should place a new focus on digital teams : software developers, app designers, and programmers - they may cost more to employ but the benefits would be far reaching with the future of publishing looking to go entirely digital!

3.0
Oct 30, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pretty lax on vacation Great products, especially compared to competition If you seek out good mentors, you can find them Industry leader

Cons

Too big...decisions take a very long time Slow to move from analog to digital, although trying No office "perks" Low Pay, or perhaps pay division (my direct reports made pennies and I felt horrible about it) I was promoted relatively fast, but many in my division went 3-4 years with no promotion

Viewing 58 - 60 of 72 Reviews

Glassdoor has 9,542 Pearson reviews submitted anonymously by Pearson employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pearson is right for you.