PerkinElmer reviews

2.8

31% would recommend to a friend

(1,175 total reviews)
avatar

Michael Stubblefield

48% approve of CEO

26% positive business outlook

PerkinElmer has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 1,175 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The PerkinElmer employee rating is 20% below average for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Apr 24, 2017

Stay clear

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The pay is kind of good.

Cons

Basically, this company has no idea what it is doing. There is a complete and utter lack of communication. Leaders are so far disconnected from their workers and managers are incompetent. There is no clear vision. They are not doing well financially. People are constantly laid off and the majority of people are working in fear that they will be the next layoff victim. Somebody new quits everyday. For a company that has been around for 75 years one would think there would be some kind of process in place, but in fact, it is the opposite. PKI is going down the tubes and I don't recommend going along for the ride.

avatar
PerkinElmer Response
8y
Good luck with your new position, we hope it works out for you.
1.0
Aug 13, 2015

Why do I torture myself?

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You can basically turn up and do nothing, nice place to sleep, even if you're a bad scientist no one will know

Cons

Everything, toxic management, everyone hates each other, be prepared for half the company to be cc'd on any email replies you get when they can be bothered to reply

1.0
Apr 24, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Brilliant, mission-driven colleagues who genuinely care - Big opportunities to lead and solve real problems—if you’re willing to take on more than your fair share - Autonomy in some roles and a chance to build from the ground up - Fast-paced environment that will test you, stretch you, and age your experience in dog years. I left with sharper instincts, thicker skin, and the kind of leadership muscle you only build when you’re thrown into the deep end—repeatedly.

Cons

-The dysfunction becomes so normalized, you start defending it. You find yourself justifying chaos, overextending to “prove your value,” and calling it loyalty—when really, it’s survival mode dressed up as engagement. - Specifically in HR— Trust is granted based on perceived seniority, not actual performance—external experience is often overvalued compared to internal results. Majority of functional coe’s have left under latest CHRO. - Executive leadership changes constantly; HR alone had four CHROs in one year, creating whiplash and confusion around priorities - Strategy often shifts mid-flight, leaving projects unsupported and teams exhausted - Recognition and accountability are inconsistent—being effective doesn’t always mean being supported - Leadership avoids hard conversations, allowing dysfunction to fester

Viewing 7 - 9 of 1,175 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,478 PerkinElmer reviews submitted anonymously by PerkinElmer employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if PerkinElmer is right for you.