PermitFlow reviews

4.0

76% would recommend to a friend

(2 total reviews)

Francis Thumpasery

85% approve of CEO

75% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

2 reviews

Reviews about ""

Return to all reviews
5.0
May 20, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I'll tackle this from a couple of angles. I joined this company with a few goals in mind after hearing about it through Y Combinator connections. I wanted to be a part of a team tackling a problem in the physical world, operating in an unglamorous space, and alongside people I felt like I could trust and go to battle with. I also knew that I had at least one big bet left in me - I have been a part of a few big 0 to 1 pushes in large corporates and at more stable startups, but have become, I suppose, enough of a risk-addict to where I wanted to raise the stakes further. All of these things have converged at PermitFlow to afford me and my coworkers an incredible opportunity to re-shape how we build and deliver physical spaces across the US. PermitFlow has delivered on every one of these dimensions and I've gotten everything I wanted out of the experience so far. Every trope or euphemism about startups you may have heard is true here 1. Priorities constantly change and evolve 2. Extreme ownership of both success and growth opps is required. 3. There are ample opportunities, once you've got your footing, to work across disciplines and across multiple different types of customer engagements. 4. The company has found strong demand in the marketplace for our service and software tooling. I have an incredible support system across the organization as well. I've met great friends, incredible talented folks from across many walks and disciplines, and have been forced to stretch outside of my comfort zone. I've also been publicly and privately credited for my work when it is impactful, am rewarded for my contributions, and feel valued as a person and an employee by nearly everyone I work with across every level of the organization. Management genuinely cares about people and wants to create a team full of top-performers, and retain high-quality talent. Generally transparent about the state of affairs at the company and what expectations are if you want to be successful at an abstract level.

Cons

Growth hurts - I've definitely had my fair share of moments where I want to give up and I've had to ask for help, spontaneously call a coworker to blow off steam, or just take a step back before re-engaging with tough problems. This is a Series A startup after all - there is a lot of ambiguity, the constantly shifting priorities can be painful or disappointing, and it hasn't all been a kumbaya experience. Things that matter to employees and employee experience - e.g., defining what career growth looks like for your role or area - are still works in progress to some degree. While this is understandable - keeping the business alive can cause tunnel vision at times - I think that when I first joined, I was unsure of what good looked like for me in my role, what growth looked like at the company, and how the company set and measured itself against goals as well. We're still figuring out performance management, but we've made a lot of strides and are dedicating smart, trustworthy people to the effort today. We are also still pretty early in our company journey - we're very analytical, sometimes to our detriment. There is pretty healthy tension between product, sales, and customer engagement, and sometimes I do wish we could move faster in automating aspects of our work, but I think our tech team is improving tremendously in terms of how they position and hold themselves accountable to pledges they make. I also think that, like many early stage startups, there's more opportunity than resources, and figuring out how to stack-rank and prioritize work, whether in tech, sales, CS, or otherwise, is a skill we're continuously improving. The work is hard, a lot is still being figured out, and we're working through those growing pains proactively and constructively, but that doesn't diminish the pain in the moment. Permitting and construction are fairly esoteric for people with traditional tech backgrounds, and vice versa for people with traditional construction management backgrounds. We're working to bridge this gap more effectively, but it's an ongoing experiment. This is part of why the opportunity here is so large, but it's not always easy to execute against.

5.0
May 9, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Why I like working at PermitFlow: I'll break this into two parts - why I like the company PermitFlow (generically useful), and why I like being a software engineer here (useful to a certain subset of people). Company wide: PermitFlow is solving a very real pain point that no one else is solving. The market opportunity for us is large and we’re growing rapidly (both in terms of revenue and headcount), and our customers love our product. I also really enjoy the positive social impact of our work. For example, many solar companies that were previously bogged down by permitting delays are now installing more solar panels. We also handle permitting for EV charger installations, and and of course we handle permitting for new homes, which hopefully will help ease the housing shortage. Engineering perspective: Our team builds a lot of useful features fast, and it's exciting to contribute to it. I think our team has the right approach to using AI - we treat it as a useful tool to solve problems - but we also focus on delivering the most customer value. Some of our cool AI use cases are extracting info out of documents or emails, navigating and parsing municipal portals to monitor applications, researching permit requirements and checking our work for potential errors. But we also focus on coming up with good technical designs, and building features where just old fashioned software engineering principles are needed. Our team is split with some fully remote team members, and others based out of the NY office (like me). It's fun to jam in person with team members, and we periodically have time for the entire team to get together in person. The quality of talent here is very high which makes it fun to work together.

Cons

Company wide: Not necessarily a con, but the team works hard. It's not crazy hours, but it's more than a 40hr work week (it's fairly common to see some people do some amount of work in the evenings or on weekends). Comp is also pretty high to reward us for working hard. Benefits aren't bad: lunch at the office and dinner if you stay late, fully covered health insurance, unlimited PTO policy (where people actually take time off), but they're not as good as some larger tech companies. There's no matching 401k or megaback door roth 401k and no fancy perks that some of the big tech companies offer. Also, stock options must be exercised within 90 days of leaving the company, rather than 10 (or some number of) years after grant date which some other companies offer. Gender diversity could also be better, and this is something that we're actively working on improving. Engineering perspective: We're a fast growing team and we've had some growing pains. When I first joined the company we didn't have a roadmap which caused some confusion/suboptimal decisions, and now we have a quarterly roadmap, but we're still working on this process. I'm sure we'll having more growing pains as we scale, and a cool part of working here is you can help solve some of them. Lots of people on our team have strong opinions. I think many of us (including myself) wanted to join a small start up because we are excited about impacting the company's direction. I've noticed because we're more opinionated, disagreements are more common than at my last job where people cared less, but it's generally fairly easy to resolve these disagreements.

Glassdoor has 66 PermitFlow reviews submitted anonymously by PermitFlow employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if PermitFlow is right for you.