RTX reviews

3.8

75% would recommend to a friend

(7,783 total reviews)
avatar

Christopher T. Calio

61% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

RTX has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 7,783 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The RTX employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

8K reviews
3.0
Feb 15, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

At Raytheon IDS there are some interesting projects to work on and some great people to work with. The benefits are very good; although some will complain about health care costs, that is a national problem and while Raytheon is not bucking that trend, it is still better than a majority of employers. The paid time off (PTO) system is barely adequate: 3 weeks for 1-4 years with the company, 4 weeks for 5-10 years then a day or two for every additional 5 years. The 9/80 schedule is great when you are able to use it.

Cons

There is a lot of inequality among departments and divisions regarding compensation based upon work quality and quantity as well as promotions. Opportunity for advancement is somewhat limited. Some of the people show up to work to collect a pay check, not to do their job well. The bureaucratic red tape can be infuriating and prevent you from doing your job effectively. Compensation is typically adjusted by 2.5-3% for a "meets requirements" while a "highly promotable" is rewarded with a 4% pay increase. Typical of large organizations in that HR decides metrics for compensation and middle-managers are forced to fit their demands. It is very easy to get lost in the shuffle or to be pigeon-holed into a role. Things move very slowly.

3.0
Feb 13, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people are great to work with. There are many really smart people that worked for the former Hughes Aircraft Co. Many of the engineers have a diverse background of education. Hughes valued that. A few locations in sunny California. Health contracts in multiple business units. Flexible time off is really great. Raytheon can offer some very creative solutions to problems (when the engineers are allowed to develop ideas). Working together at a site is typically good. Labs are nice and computers are refreshed every 3-4 years. Engineers have lots of options of where they can work in the country. The company encourages moving periodically.

Cons

The mid level management is not very competent. They miss out on key opportunities to capitalize on events. No strategic vision for growth. The organization is not agile enough due to overburdening of processes. Lack of application of modern technology. Buy it attitude as opposed to invest in your people and develop it at the company attitude. High turn over rate. No vision for investment of IRAD funds. Very difficult for different organizations to collaborate together. Also, a high degree of rejection of modern technology beacuse of "not invented here" attitude. Many cliques and if you are not in one you are out. Raytheon does not value advanced education. Too many processes. Engineers get MS word before they can get mathcad, matlab, compiler etc..... Something is wrong with this model.

3.0
Feb 13, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Raytheon has been a solid and stable employer for me in the better part of the this decade. They have been generous with "signing" bonuses and relocation support as I changed cities. The annual performance sharing is a great benefit and paid time off and year end holidays nicely complement the financial rewards. Despite the economic downturn management has been able to find their engineers work to avoid layoffs during the slow periods.

Cons

If you are interested in personal growth and good communication with coworkers, Raytheon is frustrating place to work. People can stay in their labor grade and on a given project for a long time without many opportunities for advancement. Management assigns you somewhat randomly to a project and then you become an "expert" in that area making advancement or a change difficult. I have yet to work on a project based on interests or based on where I want to be. In my experience people don't really work as a team, but rather a collection of individuals under the same task lead. As a result technical information is rarely shared across a team as whole. We have no substantive code reviews or design meetings to speak of. New engineers begin work on a project without any training and they immediately contribute, but that can translate in a lot of rework and late nights (uncompensated overtime) as the project stumbles along through development and delivery without much oversight or mentoring for the junior folks. Ironically more senior management is very process driven, but the process is centered around the business needs and appearances rather than the real technical and people issues. Some processes run by less senior project members seem more control than value oriented and few people may be able to explain why something is done the way it is.

Viewing 7609 - 7611 of 7,783 Reviews

Glassdoor has 8,461 RTX reviews submitted anonymously by RTX employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if RTX is right for you.