Rain Bird reviews

3.4

55% would recommend to a friend

(526 total reviews)
avatar

Mike Donoghue

63% approve of CEO

51% positive business outlook

Rain Bird has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 526 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Rain Bird employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

526 reviews
2.0
Dec 9, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The compensation is comparable or even better than most companies. The benefits package is nothing too extraordinary but is reasonable. If you are currently in school or are looking to go back they have a program in which you get a certain amount of money each semester, however, if you quit working for Rain Bird within a certain amount of time you are responsible to pay them back. Supposedly Rain Bird is a great place to grow as an employee and they say there is always potential to move up within the company, but this doesn't really seem to be true.

Cons

Rain Bird is very selective and have very high standards for their employees, yet it seems as though just about anyone could get a job as a manager here. It also seems as though there are WAY more managers than there need to be for the amount of employees in each division. This makes work difficult when there are ten managers involved in every decision. Managers also are not very good at giving praise for good work, but have no problem with recognizing when an employee makes a mistake and making a big deal about negative or bad things instead of giving constructive criticism they just tell you that you did a bad job and they expect much more of you than that.

1.0
Nov 26, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Rain Bird has the potential to deliver a quality product because the requirements are performance driven unfettered by any regulatory, ANSI, or government minimum "standards." The products can be technically challenging,with reasonable qualifcation process, and competent resources for components and systems. It should be possible for the technical staff to readily provide quality, innovative, focused new product offerings. There is a high degree of brand recognition and perception of quality by the customer base. Product lines have been stable with successful past efforts to provide consistent, reliable products which can capitalize on brand loyalty. The potential to exploit the dislocation of water resources with creative solutions of the "intelligent use of water" is so great that it is a conundrum that there is not explosive growth.

Cons

Rain Bird managers will step over a dollar to pick up a penny. All efforts are aimed at short term maximization of free cash. Investment in coordination of systems such as inventory management, product planning, forecasting, and customer service have fallen flat. Business units are competitive, plants are self serving and management is so bent to squeeze the extra penny, that the service level, satisfaction level, loyalty of machine operators, and general quality of operations is mediocre at best and indifferent in sustaining improved work, working conditions, retention of workers and loyalty in general. Each business unit and every autonomous plant has it's special agenda. Senior management can only control the purse. Middle managers are adept at presenting the "numbers" in the best light; he who can spin the numbers best is promoted.

Viewing 118 - 120 of 526 Reviews

Glassdoor has 574 Rain Bird reviews submitted anonymously by Rain Bird employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Rain Bird is right for you.