S&P Global reviews

4.0

81% would recommend to a friend

(9,170 total reviews)

Martina L. Cheung

79% approve of CEO

71% positive business outlook

S&P Global has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 9,170 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The S&P Global employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

9K reviews
1.0
Jul 22, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Dress code was lax, location is great, some of the teams seemed to have a great sense of community.

Cons

TL;DR- Performance reviews, bonuses, and overall quality of work are blatantly in favor of legacy employees-- regardless of the efforts and the contributions brought on by anyone that is newer to the company. Yikes. Where to begin... I was put on the mapping team that mainly consisted of legacy members. I applied for a "Test Engineer II" position and was offered a position as "Test Engineer I" with an on-boarding plan involving me moving up to the next level in a given timeline, which I reluctantly accepted. After the first few months, I found myself trapped in a stagnant state of under-compelling work that left me feeling anything but motivated. I made several attempts to approach my manager during this time asking if there was anything I could do such as acquiring certifications or external work to ensure I could stay on track with the original plan. This was constantly swept under the rug and ignored. During the first round of performance reviews, I was falsely accused of not performing a full 40 hours of work during certain weeks of the year. The accusations were brought on by another tester on the mapping team that I suspect was threatened by my presence. I had no choice at this point to bring HR into the picture while meeting with my manager to clear my name. After enough long-winded meetings, my manager finally admitted on the record that these allegations had no proof or evidence, and that I was not fudging hours on my timesheet. Shortly after these incidents, I received a poor performance review. When approaching my manager about it, all he claimed was that it was as result of a "Stack Ranking" system which made him feel "forced" into giving me this inaccurate and poor rating. Although I remained miserable for the next few following months, I gave one last attempt to bring up my concerns to my manager. I informed him that I felt more rewarded for silence than with engaging my ideas with my team. I told him how unhappy I was and how unfairly I thought I was being treated. His reaction to this was to tell me that it was probably the "Right approach" to stay quiet and under the radar and perhaps I would eventually feel better after enough time. Needless to say, I started applying for another job immediately following that meeting. To shed some light on my qualifications and work ethic, I'm now employed at a much better place where I feel engaged, challenged, and rewarded for my work. I've gotten a tremendous amount of positive feedback from my team here, and received a raise after my first few months at the company. I'm not just some angry clock watching worker-bee trying to put in a bad rep of S&P Global for the sake of it. I was legitimately miserable, bored, and mistreated my entire time there.

2.0
Mar 17, 2015

AWFUL Management

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Ability to telecommute - Access to top management of rated companies. - Decent pay for the work

Cons

- Management (Lead analytical managers on up) are only interested in protecting their jobs. Think that they are smarter and thus don't listen to analysts or explain their actions. - Implement tons of changes regardless of merit. In a hurry to do things without the thought of long term repercussions. - Morale is very poor. Managements response is let them leave.

3.0
Dec 17, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great learning experience at lower levels of analytic ranks, ability to interact with senior leadership of clients, ability to move within the company to other areas of interest, reasonably good gender balance at all levels, culture supportive of workplace flexibility such as remote working

Cons

In the last several years, S&P Global has quietly laid off scores of very experienced senior people at the director, senior director, and managing director levels. In many cases people who were absolute top performers were affected. Most of these layoffs were handled very impersonally, in mass meetings of several to a dozen people all at once. In many cases the affected people's managers were never consulted or even informed until later. Although leadership will give reasons related to improving process and the like, everybody understands it is primarily for cost reasons, despite S&P being an extraordinarily profitable company. The result is that the analytic staff is getting very junior, and the senior people are all very worried. This is a reputation-driven business, where customers want to feel that their analysts are experienced and know their business really well. S&P leadership is betting that the franchise is strong enough the get away with gutting the ranks of senior analysts, managers, and risk management people without damaging their reputation or deal flow. The result is lower morale among experienced staff and more voluntary departures, as people no longer feel that strong performance provides stability to their career at S&P.

Viewing 13 - 15 of 9,170 Reviews

Glassdoor has 10,069 S&P Global reviews submitted anonymously by S&P Global employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if S&P Global is right for you.