Shipt reviews

Inexperience galore. Too many folks accelerated into leadership roles without the necessary experience or training in how to succeed in those roles, leading to a high-churn environment. Factionalism/clique mindset - another side effect of the inexperience. Teams weren't very inclusive and often reinforcing the biases and opinions of people they were familiar with. Given that the teams were geo-diverse, this just added another layer of unwanted complication. There are some good team players, but there are an equally good number of those that aren't the easiest to get along with. The bias for action and experimentation came at the expense of doing due diligence. There was a clear disconnect between the engineering and product teams - much of it had to do with the inability of the erstwhile leadership to work in harmony. Product and features decided on by engineering teams with little consultation with the actual users or customers. Many teams working on same/similar features leading to duplicated efforts.; those that did not make it to production ended up in the scrap pile. Lack of transparency - many crucial decisions made without factoring in real data, or in many cases by ignoring facts, to suit a narrative.

You don’t matter. Making extra money or even thinking your going to make this full time think again. They hire anyone who breaths. They have no standards. When you have an issue good luck getting a English speaking person who knows what they are doing.