Slalom reviews

3.5

54% would recommend to a friend

(3,517 total reviews)
avatar

Brad Jackson

47% approve of CEO

36% positive business outlook

Slalom has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 3,517 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Slalom employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

4K reviews
2.0
Jan 4, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People are nice, the work is descent and can't beat the local model

Cons

I was told a lot of things while I was being recruited and so far nothing has come to fruition. I was told there is no budget for training but when I asked to go to a conference that I have attended for years I was told I can only go if a client goes. But people in other cities are able to go. Its a learning opportunity and I specifically asked while being recruited if I would be able to go and I was told yes. This is just one example, but so far, they have dropped the ball on all the things they told me to sell me on Slalom and make the jump. I'm 50% regretful of my decision and that's never happened before.

avatar
Slalom Response
10y
This is John Tobin. I would agree that if we told you this during the recruiting process, then we should follow through on this - it's our first core value: Do the Right Thing, Always. Further - you are right that often, in our company employees in great standing are allowed to follow through on whatever training / learning goal they have, given the right business justification. I would be happy to talk and work with your leadership team to understand the situation Simply email me at johnt@slalom.com to set something up.
1.0
Dec 29, 2015

A decent staff aug firm

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Strong family oriented culture: I honestly do believe that the some of the leaders are really trying to inculcate a great culture and value employees. - Work hours: During my 3 years at Slalom, there may have been 2 weeks where I billed more than 55 hours. Prior to Slalom, I was used to billing 60 hours on average every week. So that is some respite. If you work on downtown clients, then you get a lot of personal time to either do firm initiatives or pursue personal goals. If you work in the burbs then it is a different story. - Great office space: If you are lucky and staffed downtown you will get to use it often as well. If you are in the burbs then not so much. - Great parties: Slalom throws amazing parties. I though the concept of Rendezvous was pretty neat where you get to disconnect from work all weekend. You can bring in a guest and its fully paid.

Cons

- Lack of full disclosure in the interview process: I came from Big 4s. I really liked the work I did but did not want to travel. When I interviewed with Slalom, I was quoted that "90% of the projects were team based and 10% was staff aug"). After I joined Slalom, I realized that it was actually the reverse. Maybe 5% of their projects are team based. I also was told that I would be "local" and most of their projects were downtown which also was not true. I understand that they are trying to cater to a different kind of market - role based vs. project based and it makes sense for their size and goals (local consulting). What I did not appreciate was being presented with incorrect facts. Had I known this up front, I would not have accepted the role with Slalom as I did not want to do staff aug work or be stuck in a car for several hours a day. I would rather fly. - Travel to burbs: Although Slalom advertises no travel, they are not open about the fact that no travel by plane doesn’t mean no travel by car. Most of the time I was at Slalom, my client was anywhere from 1.5-2 hrs drive away and that is just one way. So even though I worked only 40-45 hrs a week, I spent 15 hrs a week just commuting in my car to the suburbs. I can take driving couple of hours in total on any given day, anything over that is frustrating and physically exhausting. - Staff Aug Roles: I jumped from client to client on roles which I had no interest in and which did not align with my skill sets at all. The onus is always on the consultant to grow his/her role rather than on the CSL or CSP to sell the appropriate role. I have had numerous conversations with my People Manager and other leaders at Slalom on this but no action was taken about it. On the flip side, once the clients saw what I was capable of, they always gave me better roles and raving reviews. But I always had to wait for a few months every time to prove myself. You know a place is not for you when the client recognizes your potential but your own firm doesn’t or when the client tells you to join them instead. - Career Progression: You definitely have to be part of the in-crowd to get promoted. This firm definitely values firm initiatives more than client work. I have seen individuals who were rolled off the client due to performance issues but who did organize a lot of happy hours get promoted. There is no clear definition on what the next level is or how to get promoted to it. - Leadership: Finally, I have found very few true leaders at this firm. A lot of them are resource managers with fancy titles. But very few whom you can look up to and see this is the guy/gal I want to be in 10 years. I worked at Slalom for about 3 years and I have had several conversations on all the above with my People Manager and leaders at my office. I was ready to compromise on some of them. But disappointingly, I did not have one single leader follow up with me on any of my conversations which just showed me the value they placed on me. It was like the conversations never happened. Many consultants in Slalom feel the same way from conversations I have had with them. They either decide to suck it up and be miserable or leave the company and go somewhere else.

avatar
Slalom Response
10y
This is John Tobin. I appreciate your feedback and I will share it with the Chicago leadership team. I certainly know we are not perfect and I believe we acknowledge continually balancing individual contributor work with project-based work. In a recent analysis I did, I looked at our data regarding project-based vs. individual contributor. There may be some holes in the way I looked at it, but for the Chicago market the mix was roughly 70% project-based; 30% individual contributor. Certain clients definitely sway that statistic as to how they buy. As for the commute, this is unfortunate. We obviously can't guarantee that you are going to get a desired location all the time, but I would think that we would be more responsive over a three year period. This is good feedback and I will share it with Chicago. If you have any further information you want to share, please email me at johnt@slalom.com to set up a time to talk. Thanks
2.0
Dec 24, 2015

Premier Staff Aug Firm

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Slalom prides itself in its office culture and family like atmosphere - which really shows when you walk in the office. You feel very welcomed. The office is very vibrant with free snacks, shuffleboard table, keg, and etc. They understand that majority of the former consultants lacked in work/life/balance therefore are very cognizant of their time. If you are looking to get paid descent, don't care about career progression, and would like to work 40 hour week, this is the greatest firm for you. In addition, their marketing department does a tremendous job overall. The marketing campaigns are on point and promotes awareness across all the different office. Doesn't directly translate to the projects that you will be working on but I'll give them credit - the marketing is on point. They leverage modern technology to make themselves seem like the best firm to work for - and its working, you'll see slalom on many awards and social media.

Cons

Here comes the issue for most people at the firm. I was promised that I will be engaged in Management/Technology Consulting projects..... However, 85-90% of the jobs were staff augmentation where the consultants are glorified PM and BA's that triaged failed internal IT projects locally. For those that have worked on high-value added projects in their previous life will walk away disappointed and most people wouldn't find out about this until they on-boarded a project. My first project was fielding support tickets for the IT department. Majority of the consultants that I talked to had the same complaints and not a single person seemed to be satisfied. Every discussion I had were discouraging. The so-called CSL's (who nobody at the firm really knows how they add value) will lie and sell you on projects to ensure that their accounts will remain happy. Their model is to become a "value-add staff aug" and eventually get to other internal projects for clients by delivering existing projects. So that leaves majority of the consultants to do the grunt work and have them talk their way up the chain by themselves - not a great strategy and I rather just work for the client in that case (which is happening more often than not). In addition most companies will go with a higher tier consulting firms that can provide them with a whole solution, not to fill gaps like Slalom does with Staff aug. The company does have expertise in certain areas, but that's if you join the national team which has a very similar model as the Big 4 where you will be traveling to certain clients. If you're local, you have no choice but to be stuck on Staff Aug projects. Lastly, they pride themselves as a "flat" structure and everyone is at the same level. Horrible idea. No structure for people means no career progression and any ambitious consultant will not like that. They did start creating structure as I was leaving but most promotions were based on who you knew in the office and not based on skill level. I think this is done on purpose, but as you get larger as an organization its an necessary evil. Probably something to work on. All in all - Slalom is a great Staff Aug firm, but I wish they didn't lie to themselves and gave employees empty promises of exciting projects in the pipeline. Be real about it, you measure yourself on run rate, not the quality of the projects which is the business model and I am 100% okay with that if the transparency is there. I hated being lied to and it happened right in front of my face by many of the CSL's. Overall, it was a tough decision to leave because the office culture was great, some of the leadership were respectable, but at the end of the day, I couldn't deal with the lack of career progression, constant complaints, and uninteresting staff aug projects. I don't think it would have been as big of an issue for me if this was transparent to begin with, but no one's going to join the firm if they knew what they were getting themselves into. So I'm not entirely surprised. Oh yea, and the benefits are horrific.

avatar
Slalom Response
10y
This is John Tobin. I would really like to have a conversation with you to understand more what you experienced. I'm not a fan of doing staff aug work if it is truly staff aug - we want to work on assignments with clear outcomes. We also continue to look at our "flat" structure as you say as well as real career progression. This is definitely a topic that we plan on attacking through our 2020 strategy. If you are open to it, send me an email to set up a time to discuss these items further - johnt@slalom.com Thanks
Viewing 2986 - 2988 of 3,517 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,681 Slalom reviews submitted anonymously by Slalom employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Slalom is right for you.