Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Staffmark

      Engaged Employer

      Staffmark reviews

      4.6

      93% would recommend to a friend

      (1,139 total reviews)
      avatar

      Stacey Lane

      94% approve of CEO

      88% positive business outlook

      Ratings by category

      4.7

      Diversity & inclusion

      4.6

      Culture & values

      4.5

      Work/Life balance

      4.5

      Senior management

      4.5

      Career opportunities

      4.3

      Compensation and benefits

      Staffmark has an employee rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars, based on 1,139 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Staffmark employee rating is 20% above average for employers within the Human Resources & Staffing industry (3.8 stars).

      Ratings by demographic groups

      Reviews by job title

      1K reviews
      1.0
      Jan 8, 2014

      Branch Manager

      Anonymous employee
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Prior to buy out this list was long. Since buy out there really aren't any.

      Cons

      Once purchased by the Parent Company in Japan the culture quickly changed. Do not provide the tools or support for branch staff to do their job. The Middle TN region had succeeded in celebrating very little turnover on the branch level and consistent growth in the market. Now that territory has lost significant business and turned over the vast majority of it's tenured staff.

      1.0
      Aug 12, 2013

      Awful

      Branch manager
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Decent benefits- Medical, vision and dental benefits we pretty good. Good learning experience overall. If nothing else I definitely learned what I do not like about this company and how not to treat your employees.

      Cons

      - Three years after buying two companies, they still had not completed the merger. There were offices operating in multiple ATS's in the Chicago Market. - The company is a circus...they had multiple internal employees that filed EEOC claims against the company while still working for the company in the Chicago Market. - The 401k program was so complicated there is no way for a frontline manager to be able to effectively explain how the company match portion works to a new hire without confusing them. - Unrealistic performance expectations of upper management. They are so disconnected from the front line operations that they don't see how their policy changes effect branch operations. - I grew an office from 500 hours to an office that billed 5,000 hours a week plus an onsite that billed 4,000 hours...we had two people to recruit and run the office....way too much work for internal staff.

      1.0
      Aug 8, 2013

      The worst of the worst employment agencies

      Customer service representative
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Weekly pay was the only good thing about working for this company. Finally even that wasn't enough to stick around for.

      Cons

      The agents that I dealt with were extremely dishonest about everything from the start date, job description to the hours and when I spoke up I became a "problem" and was treated like the plague. Favoritism was blatant and they didn't like the fact that I was serious and wanted them to deal with the employees who were too busy playing through training and being a distraction.

      Viewing 40 - 42 of 1,139 Reviews
      Related searches: Staffmark jobs | Staffmark salaries | Staffmark benefits | Staffmark interviews
      ReviewsStaffmark reviews

      Glassdoor has 1,429 Staffmark reviews submitted anonymously by Staffmark employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Staffmark is right for you.