Stand Together reviews

3.4

71% would recommend to a friend

(148 total reviews)
avatar

Brian Hooks

85% approve of CEO

71% positive business outlook

Stand Together has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 148 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Stand Together employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

148 reviews
2.0
Mar 20, 2019

Rotten to the Core

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits. Lots of PTO. Free drinks/food. Flexible work schedule.

Cons

Like most Koch funded non-profits, the Seminar Network has re-branded 3 or 4 times in the last few years (e.g. Freedom Partners Shared Services, Center for Shared Services, etc.), but changing the name and slapping on a new coat of paint doesn’t address the core problems for this organization and others under the “Koch” non-profit brand. They adhere to a management philosophy called Market Based Management (MBM) which was developed by Charles Koch for his private sector company Koch Industries. This management approach appears to be immensely successful for Koch Industries, but fails to transfer into a non-profit organization. In the Seminar Network MBM is weaponized and used to shutdown dissenting ideas, justify wasteful spending, and excuse a high employee turnover rate. MBM terms are thrown around so loosely that anybody walking in off the street would think you were speaking a different language. If I had to sit in one more meeting listening to somebody talk about “embracing change”, “creative destruction”, “failing small”, “challenging the status quo”, or any other MBM cliché I might have lost it. This brings me to another point, you will spend half your day sitting through useless meetings and MBM trainings. It doesn’t matter if you fall behind in your actual work because you’ve been stuck in meetings from 9-5. The answer is figure it out. I don’t know the reasons why MBM isn’t successful in the Seminar Network, but I would guess it’s because they have no real way of measuring their effectiveness as an organization or the products they produce. Everything is supported by donor money so there is no real profit incentive. Instead, they keep rebranding and changing their name. They’ve figured out that this is an easy way to refresh their image in the eyes of the donor and keep that money rolling in. In reality, this organization would have gone under years ago if asked to support itself in the free market. I feel bad for Mr. Koch because I doubt he has any idea how much of his money is being wasted on this boondoggle. The final point I want to bring up is the office environment. This place is essentially high school. The amount of office politics and gossip that goes on behind your back is disturbing. If somebody has a problem with you or something you did, rather than confront you like an adult and attempt to solve the problem, they go behind your back to a manager or supervisor to complain. Once you get on somebody’s bad side, they will begin building a file on you and record everything in writing just in case they ever want to fire you, I mean “embrace change”. This organization is all about becoming buddy-buddy with those on top and the go along to get along mentality.

avatar
Stand Together Response
7y
Thanks for the review. We have transformed not just our name but more importantly our operations and effectiveness over the years. We continually seek knowledge from our team members and our partners so that we can hone our strategies and empower as many people as possible to become social change entrepreneurs. Marginal improvements are surely a step in the right in the direction, but in this dynamic and fast-paced environment, our Guiding Principles and management philosophy encourage us to strive for transformational change so that we can much more rapidly remove the barriers that stand in the way of each individual’s ability to realize their full potential. But it’s not just our team at The Seminar Network; we have united with non-profit leaders at over 100 community-based groups, over 700 of the country’s most effective business leaders and philanthropists, over 1000 professors at 350 universities, tens of thousands of K-12 teachers, and millions of grassroots activists in 35 states. Together we have moved the needle on some of the country’s most pressing problems. We are certainly not perfect, but I’m truly sorry that you were not better connected to the incredible ways your colleagues are advancing social change. We wish the best in your career. -- Katey
1.0
Jul 13, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

On the surface, the mission and goals of Stand Together are virtuous and purposeful. And unlike most nonprofits, they operate without economical constraints. In theory this should make mission-driven work and it’s impact more accessible. On the same card, the compensation and benefits are stellar.

Cons

Where to begin.. I think the most toxic quality is they hide behind their culture (they call this ‘MBM’ or market based management) as a system and scapegoat for literally every decision. Because the tenets of this culture philosophy are highly flexible and subjective it usually leads to a weaponization over proper application. This may seem moot, as most companies have culture strawmen. But here you will find it impedes every decision, it taxes the already constrained matrix of their organization. The second red flag is leadership, especially the C-suite and Vice Presidents. Cronyism is rife in Stand Together. There is rampant tribalism and it feels like a bad coming-of-age film where your constantly trying to impress and get-in with these executives. Again, this isn’t an uncommon trait in large corporations but there is sincere conflict of interests and those at the top mask their fallacies and errors by pointing the finger and throwing more junior team members under the bus. And that’s another thing I’ll say here, for a nonprofit organization someone should look closely at who they outsource work to and the historical affiliations with these partners. Let’s just say $ is going from left pocket to right pocket to the tune of millions of dollars a year. Last note, they are pushing an “in office culture” despite nearly 50% of the employees being remote and a vast majority of the organization being against “return to office” ~ but in a very top down fashion the boomers sitting in the C-suite refuse to acknowledge the advice of their peers and co workers. This is all because they signed a giant commercial lease on new headquarters and are now claiming “culture” is the driver of an in person migration.

2.0
Jan 30, 2023

Lazy Management, broken promises.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits, good unlimited PTO and you can even abuse this privilege if you'd like (depending on if management likes you).

Cons

Where to begin here: Management is lazy. Often we were told that we made our own day, and a high importance is put on being independent. That's lovely, except they sit in their offices and ask us to work. Supervisors lead. Stand Together supervisors do not. They are out of touch of what goes on day to day in the office, and use their philosophy of Market Based Management to make excuses for their behavior. I found it comical that my manager said I was not fit for MBM as I was meant to be micromanaged, when they were never present and interested in our day to day work! Lot of toxic mean girl gossip and behavior, I often thought management were stuck in high school with their horrible attitudes. Avoid Stand Together if possible and heed the other negative reviews. They have merit.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 148 Reviews

Glassdoor has 160 Stand Together reviews submitted anonymously by Stand Together employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Stand Together is right for you.