employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Summit Public Schools

Is this your company?

Summit Public Schools reviews

3.3

47% would recommend to a friend

(147 total reviews)
avatar

Diane Tavenner

42% approve of CEO

39% positive business outlook

Summit Public Schools has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 147 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Summit Public Schools employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

147 reviews
1.0
Sep 30, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A lot about Summit is grounded in good intentions: the greatest goal of its educational model is to ensure that every single student, all from different socioeconomic backgrounds, is accepted into a four-year university. The CEO, directors, and other designers of the model work tirelessly to improve on that mission. Summit is constantly striving to be at the cutting edge of education, and it truly is a new and different approach to education. Unfortunately, though, these seemingly positive aspects of Summit's model do not manifest the way they should. While there truly is a commitment to excellence from all Summit's teachers and staff, how that energy is channeled by admin and the CEO is seriously awry.

Cons

The list is long: -Completely overworked and under-appreciated staff (teachers). Most days are 7:00am-5:30pm without a break. Yes, you rarely receive prep time at Summit, and your lunch if often taken up by a meeting, lunch duty outside, or patrolling the hallways. And while the day is supposed to end at 5pm (already way too late for a school day!), you frequently have student-parent meetings you are required to attend that go until 6pm or later. Again, this is all without any sort of break in your day to catch your breath, grade, answer emails, or work on your curriculum. It's just a long, mad dash to get anything done. -This is perhaps the worst con of them all: the culture is unprofessional and emotionally unsafe. The admin at my Summit site truly managed through terror; there were interrogatory meetings where people were accused of "workplace crimes" they never committed or that weren't even legitimate "crimes," a constant punitive tone to all-staff meetings, and a general sense that everyone was waiting to catch you in a mistake so you could be made to feel inefficient and incompetent. -The culture among teachers was also unprofessional and unsafe. My colleagues did things like poll their students as to which teachers they felt were the most annoying, or report other teachers to HR about a personal tiff they had but didn't have the integrity to speak with the person face-to-face. In all staff meetings, there were constantly eyes being rolled and faces being made behind other's backs when someone said something others deemed a waste of time or inaccurate. -The educational model is seriously flawed and failing many students. For example, there was a policy that all high-schoolers can turn in or revise their work whenever they want, as much as they want, without receiving any negative effect in their grades. While this idea appealed to me upon joining Summit because I believe in giving students many chances to improve on their skills, it quickly became clear that this just encouraged students to never turn their work in on time (I usually had about a 20% turn-in rate for any given assignment) and to wait until the last week of school (we were on a year-long grading period) to turn in every hastily and half-completed assignment from the year. When we went on a tour of colleges with our students (cool idea, but another example of how teachers are overworked-- we had to plan every single thing about the 3-day tour, including the budget), we met some former Summit students who told us that a lot of the policies at Summit, such as the revision policy I just mentioned, were actually detrimental to their learning because when they got to college, they weren't in the habit of meeting deadlines or producing a final draft when something was due. -Relationships between staff and students are often bordering unprofessional territory. Teachers are basically required (heavily encouraged) to provide their phone numbers to students and parents and be habitually texting with them (I'm talking multiple texts a day after school hours, often unrelated to academics). Teachers are also virtually required to hang out with their students/mentees (Summit has a mentor program) outside of school. A lot of teachers would go to their students' houses on a weekly basis or go to movies with them. I hope I don't sound like a curmudgeon or a party-pooper, but I think that to create a culture where teachers who aren't constantly texting with or hanging out with their students feel inferior, is both unprofessional and overly demanding. -There is a common assessment program among all the Summit schools, meaning that you (as the teacher) are provided with a rubric and a set of skills, and that is the only mode of assessment you can use. All the teachers, of all subjects, use the same rubric and skills. While this was also something I supported when I started working at Summit, I quickly realized how inefficient and inoperative it was. All teachers felt that at least a few of the skills, if not all of them, had very confusing rubric language descriptors and were not only impossible for students to interpret and understand, but teachers too! Furthermore, if you were creating an assignment and really needed to assess something particular and unique to that assignment or just to your subject, it was endlessly frustrating to not have the power to do so. -Summit values scaling its business over fixing problems that already exist and addressing resource gaps in its existing sites. Most of their school sites are crammed into small buildings with no real classroom space nor walls between classrooms, and no outside or indoor play or hang-out area for kids to let out energy and get much-needed physical activity in their school day. Teachers are not given a cent to purchase resources for their classrooms-- they are told they just have to spend their own money for materials. Instead of addressing these huge resource gaps, Summit chooses to squeeze out all the money in their budget to create new schools under the guise that the "model is really working" and that "their name is getting out there." I work at a different school this year, and have found that none of these issues exist here and that they are truly problems unique to Summit. I am one hundred times the teacher at my new school than I was at Summit because I have more genuine and untainted support from admin and colleagues, and I have the liberty to teach my subject and assess my students the way that authentically works for me and for my students as individuals. In sum, I am extremely disappointed in the outcome of Summit's educational model and the culture that exists there and would strongly advise anyone considering Summit to look elsewhere for employment.

2.0
Aug 2, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The PLP (personalized learning platform) is a great tool for educators and students because it stores student projects and compiles student data for teachers to easily evaluate which student groups need more assistance. -The classes are not tracked, or ability grouped, which aligns with research findings. -Small school environment (100 per grade level; 25 per class) -Teachers have some advocacy depending on their admin's willingness to push back on his/her bosses. -Nearly 100% students get into college (from a population where ~80% are from families that qualify for free and reduced lunch and will be the first generation in college in their families. -Mentor program. Teachers are also mentors to a group of 20ish students, and the mentor's job is to prepare them for college and coach students through personal issues throughout the 4 years in high school.

Cons

Teacher pay is not competitive for Bay Area living. A teacher with 3 years' experience makes about 57,000/year, which is far from a living wage here. -Teacher turnover is high, which makes a school environment less stable for students. -Teachers are not encouraged to make their own curriculum and are instead coerced into using a shared curriculum which is made collectively in subject level teams. -One of the directors of schools: "If you enjoy designing and implementing your own curriculum, then this is not the place for you." -The school model changes from year to year. One year a subject teacher could be responsible for 1 level of that subject and the next it could be 2. -Required meetings keep teachers on campus sometimes until 6:30 pm twice a week. -A culture of burnout: Teachers are expected to work at home, meaning time with loved ones, and time for yourself is sacrificed, leading to teacher burnout. -No sports or music programs for students unless a teacher takes it upon him/herself to create/manage one. -Summit has a de facto "no deadlines" policy for student work, meaning that teachers are expected to convince students to turn assignments and project in on time with out any real incentive or consequence when it's not submitted. This results in many students failing to complete several projects for each class throughout the year and by the end of the year, they are expected to complete almost a years' worth of assignments. This further means that the teachers are held accountable for getting students to pass. We are encouraged to come up with "creative solutions" for students who are far behind to help students pass because it's part of the culture that students don't get held back at Summit.

2.0
Mar 15, 2016

Teacher

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Incredible colleagues; intelligent, passionate, energetic educators. Couldn't ask for a better group of people to call coworkers.

Cons

Many top-down philosophies/policies that are widely disagreed with/seen as ineffective at a classroom level. Input often seems considered only at a superficial level. Work-life balance is incredibly difficult, and burnout rates are high among teachers

Viewing 1 - 3 of 147 Reviews

Glassdoor has 159 Summit Public Schools reviews submitted anonymously by Summit Public Schools employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Summit Public Schools is right for you.