employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Swartz Campbell

Is this your company?

Swartz Campbell reviews

2.9

19% would recommend to a friend

(30 total reviews)

Sharon McGrail-Szabo

39% approve of CEO

27% positive business outlook

Swartz Campbell has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 30 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Swartz Campbell employee rating is 23% below average for employers within the Legal industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

30 reviews
1.0
Nov 21, 2015

I have PTSD from having worked here.

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You get your foot in the door with the legal market in Philly, working in a Philly high-rise is pretty cool for about the first week, got some CLEs paid for.

Cons

Being associated with the Professional Liability group of Swartz Campbell was, well, a professional liability.If you are thinking about working for this firm, you probably are hoping for one of two things: first, that you will settle into this place and work your way up, or, second, you will work here for a short while and then leap-frog to something bigger and better. You have been warned: It will not pan out like that. From the top down, this firm is a prime example of how incompetent leaders can destroy an entity from the inside out, and no matter how much of a cleverly-worded review they try to use to justify their vulgar actions, the damage cannot be undone. I have experienced the vile nature of some of these partners. There is absolutely no coaching/mentoring, communication, strategy or teamwork in this place. An associate's job description should simply read "Putting out fires". Every day was filled with one crisis after the other. These crises were created by the partners' inability to lead (as mentioned, there was no communication so until matters got to the edge of the cliff, associates don't hear about them). Even worse, there was no effort by the partners to fix their faults or even make them manageable so things continually spiraled out of control. If you're a young associate trying to learn the trade, this is not the environment for you. On a more personal note, there are some of the worst personalities I have ever met here. There are no "good mornings" or "how was your weekend" here. You go in and work to the bone while keeping your pie hole shut. Another example of the nature of this place is a sign that was posted in the kitchnette. It read "Your mother does not work here. Clean up after yourself!!!!!". Using this place as a stepping stone sounds appealing but their reputation is widely-known in the regional insurance defense market. I read elsewhere the billing practices were not completely ethical. I agree. On numerous occasions I was asked to bill for tasks I did not do. I was also asked to slow down and to spend "enough time" handling things. Efficiency? Not in this place. The goal is only to maximize your hours. Also, the compensation here is on par with single-member firms. Despite any hot air being offered about how compensation "is tied to the amount of effort put in" by the associates, compensation is actually whatever the minimum amount they can give you to keep you there for another month or so. This place has gotten so bad that various offices are seceding from the main firm. For example, an office in Florida recently seceded and became associated with another firm. Its that bad.

1.0
Jan 18, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Associates are often in control of their destinies, at least to a certain extent. The firm gives you the opportunity to get hands-on experience rather early on if you kiss the proper rings. The trade-offs are many, however.

Cons

I feel compelled to write a review because of how much this firm has hamstrung my career to date. When you enter a litigation practice, you have to anticipate, and be willing to deal with, a certain level of abrasiveness. Swartz Campbell takes that norm to a whole new level, unfortunately, which is proven by the number and intensity of the other reviews. For that reason, I don't care to write too much about that topic other than reaffirming other peoples' experiences. The topic that has driven me write out this review is how much of a bad sign "Swartz Campbell" on your resume is to other Philadelphia-area firms. I am a few years removed from Swartz Campbell and in the job market looking for my next jump. I got a call from a recruiter I am working with and despite having the grades and experience a top Philly firm is looking for, they singled out my Swartz Campbell experience as why they won't be extending me an offer. The recruiter explained the logic behind this: most firms know the type of training (or lack thereof) SC provides its Associates and they want to stay away from having attorneys with that type of training/mindset/approach to the legal practice from effecting their own firms. This wasn't the first time SC has come up for me in my job hunt. A while ago, I had an interview with a large firm that lasted about 45 mins and dealt almost entirely with my experience at SC. They asked a number of questions centered on which partners I worked for and how I would go about approaching various tasks. I didn't make the connection then, but they wanted to get a better idea of what "kind" of lawyer I was. I didn't get the job. The moral of the story is (especially for newer attorneys) your trademark will be your professional experiences, which means you have to be very cautious which firms your join early on. Human nature simplifies all analyses, and so your future prospective employers WILL categorize you based off your work pedigree, as they do with your schooling. Work for a dismal firm and be regarded as a dismal attorney. This is why so many of our colleagues at SC were either there for a long time or a very short time. People there for a long time couldn't get out and people there for a short time knew the diminished career prospects and were OK being a flash in the pan and making a run for it right away. You rarely see people join for 4-6 years and then leave, a sure sign of the effect of the firm on one's career. Some people might feel they don't have the option but to accept an offer from SC, and that might be the case. However, they have to be willing to accept the effect their time at SC may have on their career trajectory, which includes your compensation. It is hard to imagine spending time at SC (even as little as a few months) and having illustrious opportunities and large salaries come your way thereafter. I'm sure it has been done, but most people must heed caution. If given the option to work for SC or some smaller suburban firm or company, I would go with either of the latter options. It's not worth it to join SC in the long run. I wish I had never taken a chance on Swartz Campbell. It has been the biggest mistake of my legal career that has caused me a tremendous amount of stress, reduced compensation, wasted time with failed interviews, and a loss of opportunity.

1.0
Aug 16, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

flexible with my schedule; learned about office politics and legal field

Cons

lack of communication and appreciation and recognition from those in power

Viewing 4 - 6 of 30 Reviews

Glassdoor has 32 Swartz Campbell reviews submitted anonymously by Swartz Campbell employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Swartz Campbell is right for you.