employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Washington Post

Engaged Employer

The Washington Post reviews

3.0

34% would recommend to a friend

(643 total reviews)
avatar

Jeff D’Onofrio

Not enough data to show CEO approval

10% positive business outlook

The Washington Post has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 643 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The The Washington Post employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

643 reviews
4.0
Aug 6, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- A media organization with integrity in its DNA. Feels good to work for a company that provides a civic value to its readers and to the nation, writ large. - Working alongside some of the smartest people I've ever worked with. The level of technical knowledge / expertise of my colleagues in their specific focus area is generally very high. - Salary level is where I would expect it to be, based on my experience and the market rate for equivalent positions in the DMV area. - Colleagues that take the work seriously while retaining a healthy sense of humor. 
- A good mix of ages and experience levels. Makes interacting with coworkers more valuable and more conducive to learning about people's backgrounds that are different from my own. - Flexible schedule. - Frequency of meetings for non-managers in my department is generally low. - Office is fairly quiet, well-lit, and aesthetically pleasing. - Convenient location for metro and multiple bus lines.

Cons

- Still a lot of cis white men in charge at executive level. 
- Internally, I get the sense that there is a struggle between "old guard" and new guard. Perhaps an over-reliance on traditional business hierarchies or distinctions that served the organization well when it was mainly a print newspaper, but not so much as a modern, multi-channel company. 
- There are a number of mid-level managers in different departments that appear to have little to no management experience. They seem to possess the technical acumen appropriate to their role, but not the interpersonal / emotional awareness to properly mentor team members and build up individual strengths. - Availability of resources seems to be an issue in my department which can lead to choppy workflow and loss of momentum. - Occasional "hurry up and wait" projects that jockey for priority/ urgency, somewhat arbitrarily. - Related to the above – not enough of a focus on quality over quantity. IE taking on too many initiatives with not enough time committed to making them excellent experiences. - A good number of engineering staff are remote workers, which makes it harder to establish a sense of team unity and makes communication a bit tedious. - Documentation and review of completed work is rare in my department - more time could be committed to learning from our past endeavors. - Very few processes or standards in place for on-boarding new hires in my department. - The open office layout can be a little distracting and lacks sufficient privacy for occasional personal calls or sensitive conversations.

avatar
The Washington Post Response
7y
Thanks for taking the time to write a review. We agree- the integrity of The Washington Post and the people behind it is the spine and soul of this company. We’re glad you’re a part of that. Also, thanks for your feedback. We take it very seriously as we strive to be an excellent place to work for all. That’s why we created The Leadership Project to come alongside and equip The Post’s management on leading great teams. We’ll pass along all your feedback to our team. If you have any more details, feel free to confidentially email us at life@washpost.com. Thanks for being part of The Washington Post team.
5.0
Jul 30, 2018

A legacy for a reason

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Washington Post is filled with smart people who hold up a culture of innovation and curiosity. Managers are willing to listen and support their teams' interests and ideas.

Cons

The company is very large so it will take time to get to know everyone from different teams and departments. Nonetheless, there are many opportunities created by the company to try to bridge this gap.

avatar
The Washington Post Response
7y
Thanks for taking the time to write a review and for your insights. We will definitely continue to host events for departments to get to know each other and to have check-ins for employees and managers. Thanks again for writing a review and for being part of The Washington Post team.
5.0
Jul 27, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I recently accepted an internal recruiter position at the Washington Post. So far, it has been amazing! The technology side of the Post is really something that is not talked about enough. They have the traditional work that they are most known for (which is exciting and interesting) but they also have a technology side that is innovative and very cutting edge. If you want to work for a well known organization, a place that has a great reputation, work with smart and interesting people and feel like you are making an impact; then you should consider working at the Washington Post.

Cons

There are cons with everyone organization but the ones at the Washington Post are so minimal that they are not even worth mentioning.

avatar
The Washington Post Response
7y
Thanks for your feedback. We're so glad you've had a positive experience so far at The Washington Post. We're proud of the fact that we are a media and media technology company and we're glad you've found The Post to be innovative. Thanks for being part of The Washington Post team!
Viewing 412 - 414 of 643 Reviews

Glassdoor has 713 The Washington Post reviews submitted anonymously by The Washington Post employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if The Washington Post is right for you.