Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      UKG

      Engaged Employer

      UKG reviews

      3.2

      48% would recommend to a friend

      (7,060 total reviews)

      Jennifer Morgan

      43% approve of CEO

      41% positive business outlook

      Ratings by category

      3.7

      Diversity & inclusion

      3.7

      Compensation and benefits

      3.4

      Work/Life balance

      3.1

      Culture & values

      3.0

      Career opportunities

      2.6

      Senior management

      UKG has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 7,060 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The UKG employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.7 stars).

      Ratings by demographic groups

      Reviews by job title

      7K reviews
      5.0
      Feb 26, 2025

      Great place to work with great people

      Anonymous employee
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      - Positive work environment - Smart & kind colleagues - Great Benefits & flexible schedules

      Cons

      While it's been mostly positive there's been lots of significant leadership changes over the past year.

      4.0
      Feb 26, 2025

      UKG = Great Place to Work!

      Anonymous employee
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Paid health benefits Great people Unlimited PTO Fantastic culture Appreciates and promotes diversity, equity and inclusion Fantastic leadership

      Cons

      Low base pay Certain roles tend to cause high stress A lot of change happening currently

      5.0
      Feb 26, 2025

      Challenging

      Lead software engineer
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Increased efficiency: Combining these roles can streamline the development process, as one person is responsible for both writing code and testing it. This can lead to faster development cycles and less time spent on handoffs between teams. Improved quality: Engineers who are responsible for both development and quality assurance have a deeper understanding of the codebase. This can result in better testing and fewer bugs in the final product. Enhanced sense of ownership: When engineers are responsible for both development and quality assurance, they have a greater sense of ownership over the final product. This can lead to increased motivation and higher quality work. Diverse skills: This role allows engineers to develop a wide range of skills, making them more valuable to the company.

      Cons

      Increased workload: Combining these roles can lead to a significant increase in the workload of engineers. This can lead to burnout and reduced productivity. Potential for bias: When engineers are responsible for both development and quality assurance, there may be potential for bias. They may be less likely to find bugs in their own code. Need for diverse skills: This role requires engineers to possess a wide range of skills, which can make it difficult to find qualified candidates. Possibility of a drop in specialization: By combining the two roles, it is possible that engineers may not be able to specialize as deeply in either of the two areas, which could lead to a drop in expertise.

      Viewing 724 - 726 of 7,060 Reviews
      Related searches: UKG jobs | UKG salaries | UKG benefits | UKG interviews | UKG conversations
      ReviewsUKG reviews

      Glassdoor has 7,762 UKG reviews submitted anonymously by UKG employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if UKG is right for you.