Wood Mackenzie reviews

3.3

57% would recommend to a friend

(880 total reviews)
avatar

Jason Liu

49% approve of CEO

47% positive business outlook

Wood Mackenzie has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 880 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Wood Mackenzie employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

880 reviews
3.0
Jan 27, 2026

Fair enough

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work time, sufficient annual leave

Cons

Too many layoffs and turnover

avatar
Wood Mackenzie Response
5mo
Thank you for taking the time to share you experience. First, it's really great to hear that you value flexible working approach and our annual leave policy support you and other colleagues well. It really is important for us that WoodMackers have the space they need to balance work and life. Feedback like this suggests that it is largely working but we need to keep improving and not rest on our laurels. Turning to your concern: You raise an important concern about layoffs and turnover. We know this has been difficult for WoodMackers. We have made some tough organisational decisions to align our structure with our long‑term strategy and how we as a company can create value. These decisions were not taken lightly, and we absolutely understand the impact they have on our colleagues and on overall morale. Our focus is on ensuring stability. Investing in key parts of the business (which you hopefully have seen) and strengthening career development so people can see a clear future here and have the ability to move around the business too. Retention, trust and culture really are priorities for us. We're committed to making steady, tangible process. Thank you again for your honest and for all you do for WoodMac.
5.0
Jan 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Best in class analysis - delivered via research and consulting businesses - and clients need quality and *connected* analysis even more than ever before. (It feels a little trite to quote The Book, but its true and I'm glad we have finally taken this perspective to market) Thoughtful, caring colleagues. I've been through too many natural disasters during my time in Houston, and there are always Woodmackers who rally around to support. Lastly, there are few other companies where the Analyst is truly celebrated. In industry, an analyst is just the low rung on the totem pole until you get to be a negotiator or into business development. Here, we have a Chairman and Chief Analyst -- we celebrate our analysis!!

Cons

Sometimes it feels like there are a lot of people that are removed from our core purpose in life: delivering thoughtful data and analysis to our customers. There were always people who made the business run, but now it seems like some of these support functions have a lot of management layers.

avatar
Wood Mackenzie Response
4mo
Thank you very much for your thoughtful feedback and showed the world how highly we value our analysis! Thank you for your commentary on the structure of the business too. We will feed that back internally. We are really grateful for your insight and all that you do for WoodMac!
2.0
Jan 26, 2026

Getting worse

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. There are genuinely smart and kind people here, and it’s possible to make good friends—often bonded by shared suffering, admittedly. 2. Work–life balance is generally decent, with a high degree of flexibility. For example, going into the office is not mandatory. 3. The company places emphasis on culture, and office presence and social engagement are actively encouraged.

Cons

1. Offshoring a large number of roles to India has not solved core problems beyond cost-cutting. Research quality has declined, and middle management based in India has, in many cases, worsened the culture while adding unnecessary bureaucracy. 2. The organizational structure is bloated and redundant. There is an excessive layer of middle management, much of which contributes little real value while actively making day-to-day work harder. Since these roles exist primarily to “manage people,” their impact often comes down to superficial busywork or pressuring their teams. Honestly, cutting just one of these meaningless roles could probably pay for the office snack budget that was cut, lol. 3. Micromanagement, microaggressions, and even subtle discrimination are not nonexistent. While these issues may be infrequent and team-specific, they do occur and create uncomfortable and unhealthy team dynamics. 4. Business operations are chaotic. Processes are poorly documented, knowledge transfer is weak, and institutional memory disappears when people leave. In many cases, no one knows how previous research was conducted. From this perspective, the company is still winning deals largely by running on the remaining credibility of its brand.

Viewing 37 - 39 of 880 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,022 Wood Mackenzie reviews submitted anonymously by Wood Mackenzie employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Wood Mackenzie is right for you.