X Sr. Software Engineer reviews

2.3

8% would recommend to a friend

(99 total reviews)
avatar

Linda Yaccarino

35% approve of CEO

1% positive business outlook

Sr. Software Engineer employees have rated X with 2.3 out of 5 stars, based on 99 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Sr. Software Engineer professionals have an average working experience there. X is rated 40% below average by Sr. Software Engineer professionals compared to other employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

99 reviews
2.0
Mar 28, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1- Twitter NYC is still a small engineer office, you have the chance to know everyone and influence through mentoring and hard work (or used to be that place... more on that on cons) 2- The engineering team is a very diverse group, from cultural aspects, professional and academic backgrounds. It not only fits the image of NYC diversity but also makes it open to diversity. 3- In Twitter, you have the chance to work with open source at large scale. See Twitter's github page to have a perspective on how much contributions there have been made and the frameworks you'd be working on.

Cons

As a rational candidate, you can observe the high rate senior engineers and engineers managers departures have left the company after 3-4 years. If you are optimistic person, take the fact they are fully vested and keep the pros. Otherwise, read-on.. Since the IPO, eng managers are unable to push back upper management decisions. Frequently, because they are young first-time managers, they start acting erratically against their own team, including arbitrary job terminations (e.g.: engineers were recently promoted before being terminated under the excuse of underperforming). As result, they inadvertently create dysfunctional work environment, since people either get emotionally detached from work or fighting for survival (in a remote office it becomes even tougher b/c there is no place to go.) At IC level, if you've been in the industry long enough, you know what to expect from engineers in self-preservation, e.g.: code being pushed into private git repo's WHILE design review is still underway to get ahead of the "competition", obnoxious code reviews to slow down the "competitor", never questioning dysfunctional management decisions in meetings (playing the favoritism game.) Twitter was once a great place to work because it fostered creativity in engineers, giving the opportunity to grow their careers truly on a merits basis, i.e.: from own ideas to execution. Most of the work now is on-demand basis and most of self-expansion would happen during your extra time (yet not very valuable nevertheless.)

1.0
Feb 17, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- smart coworkers - cool brand - standard tech company perks Industry best practices can be learnt here. The compensation is competitive.

Cons

- new products and features often don't ship - not a meritocracy After the IPO there were a lot of high-level firings, and each of those induced a re-org and blew away the product and feature development that occurred underneath. So, a lot of times yo'd see a feature developed, then abandoned or delayed, then attempted again six months later by another team. On acquihires, problems arise when there's an obvious conflict of interest (e.g. someone high in the company is old pal's with the acquihired company's CEO), when good people are displaced and/or fired to make room for acquihired folk, and when acquihired folk parachute into the org with outsized titles and compensation, screwing over everyone who came in the front door and who had been working honestly. Tolerance and encouragement of this sort of cronyism is destructive not just to rank-and-file employees but to all shareholders. Twitter presents itself externally as this hyper-ethical company super-concerned with noble ideas like user safety, but on the inside odd things happen, like a time a bunch of employees were fired with no notice and the survivors were told they could not ask questions and that no explanation would be given. Given these conditions, employees are incentivized to leave the company as soon as they vest some stock and the learning slows, which happens at the two year mark, on average.

5.0
Feb 9, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Smart colleagues - Very transparent, open culture; uncomfortable questions get asked and answered! - Great offices, amazing food - Tough challenges - Internal branch out program, very easy to switch teams - Technical debt gets prioritized - Open Source is actively practiced

Cons

- Very rapid change, don't get too comfortable with your current project, it might be gone tomorrow

Viewing 85 - 87 of 99 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,811 X reviews submitted anonymously by X employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if X is right for you.