Good night 🤪
34
Didn’t get promoted and thinking of leaving Deloitte for the next level at Guidehouse. It’s a title bump so I would get a raise, but I’m trying to weigh the opportunity cost of going to a “lower tier” firm known for more niche services. Has anyone else been in this situation and what did you choose? Would this limit my exit opps?
Senior consultant at Capgemini frog or consultant at Accenture song Chicago office. Previous comments told me to go for Accenture … however I am early career neurodivergent queer woman and im not sure which would be a better cultural fit if i did want to stay for a couple of years. money wise I am looking at similar pay range.
Tbh who are these people
I think it’s the angle of the camera tbh. The two in the middle look scary.
Hmm personally would've classed Federer as McK but really none of them slot into MBB that neatly
At least we are aging well - Bain’s hairline is looking rough
Oh please god no. Each of these competitors is WAY more interesting and talented than an MBB consultancy. Completely different playing styles that all yield a ton of success. Much more interesting to use younger players: Jannik Sinner - McKinsey Questionable ethical situations (PED) explained away with money and settlements (Ignorance and plausible deniability) Alexander Zverev - BCG Talented, but involved in potentially compromising situations (Kohl's, EMEA work) as potential domestic abuse, but allegations can't be proven definitively Danil Medvedev - Bain Solid, consistent and dependable, but always falling a bit short behind the other two. No real controversies to date I can't use Alcaraz because he's way too much of a multigenerational talent with zero controversies.
John McEnroe - and he was in the 80s. Pretty good player honestly - got the best of Bjorn Borg and Jimmy Connors several times. Borg was probably the best of the bunch though. Made it look easy out there.
Only one MBB and that is Federer. The rest is wannabes
A few look like are famous