As someone who conducts recruitment processes daily, I feel it is important to share with you my candidate experience to take into any account that you might find constructive. On behalf of Amazon, the interview was very disappointing in terms of professionalism. Candidate Attraction Initially I was contacted via LinkedIn for this role by one of your internal recruiters, and when I finally agreed to interview I was faced with a unenthusiastic and uninformative phone call. I would expect at least some information on the role, the project, the problem, or whatever else the requirement was to fulfill. It would be assumed that the candidate would be briefed on this information prior or after the interview questions in an initial conversation. Knowledge on Requirement There was a number of times I had to seek clarification on the questions being asked as they didn't seem to make sense, and even then I felt they couldn't be defined by the interviewer. I am still unsure if it was lack of knowledge about the questions being asked or the English barrier, but as a current employee of Amazon conducting the interview I do hope it is the latter. Knowledge on Candidate Approached The interviewer was admittedly confused about the agency recruitment process and how it worked - this is worrying as I presume recruiters in Amazon do 360/full life-cycle recruitment and potentially have to interact with agency recruiters from time to time. Regardless, if there was interest in my CV (an agency recruiter) I would have assumed the interviewer would know the general idea of the candidates expected responsibilities. With no disrespect, it is prominent to display an enjoyable candidate experience with those who go through any recruitment process in an organisation for many reasons. Is it the backbone of the culture and reputation for any company, especially in the Irish market as it is extremely small. I hope you find this somewhat useful.