Community Representative applicants have rated the interview process at American Cancer Society with 2.8 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 50% positive. To compare, the company-average is 60.9% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Community Representative roles take an average of 38 days to get hired, when considering 13 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at American Cancer Society overall takes an average of 26 days.
Common stages of the interview process at American Cancer Society as a Community Representative according to 13 Glassdoor interviews include:
One on one interview: 21%
Phone interview: 21%
Background check: 16%
Group panel interview: 14%
Personality test: 7%
IQ intelligence test: 7%
Drug test: 5%
Presentation: 5%
Skills test: 5%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at American Cancer Society (Grand Rapids, MI) in Sep 2011
Interview
Very friendly interview process done in a timely manner. The first stage was a phone interview to review skills to make sure they matched the position. Following that I had an in person interview followed by a second in person interview with an additional staff member. The overall process took a month, but the organization kept in contact throughout the process. Very open staff and they answered all of the questions I had prepared and cared to know what my interests were outside of the work environment.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
They did ask you to prepare a three minute presentation, very conversational, on how you would talk to community members about Relay For Life.
I applied online. The process took 3 weeks. I interviewed at American Cancer Society (Denver, CO)
Interview
The interview was long - it lasted a full hour. The questions were abstract and many of them were situational questions that seemed completely unrelated to the position. Many of the questions were also open-ended, prompting you to give an examples of how you respond to different instances. It was extremely vague and some of the questions were unclear.