Software Engineer applicants have rated the interview process at Clever with 2.7 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 48% positive. To compare, the company-average is 43.9% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Software Engineer roles take an average of 23 days to get hired, when considering 29 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Clever overall takes an average of 23 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Clever as a Software Engineer according to 29 Glassdoor interviews include:
Phone interview: 40%
Skills test: 17%
One on one interview: 15%
Presentation: 12%
Group panel interview: 10%
Personality test: 4%
Drug test: 2%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 5 weeks. I interviewed at Clever (Atlanta, GA) in Mar 2022
Interview
You start with some simple HR screenings, followed by a paired technical coding assessment, and lastly a 4-5 hr virtual onsite where you have 5 more interviews (2 more tech, 2 more hr, 1 wrap up and summary with hiring manager)
Paired tech interview was fairly simple. It is more about being able to talk through your process with another engineer and show your coding competency.
I am scheduled for the onsite and will update once I finish it, but its a architecture/system's design and a networking tech interviews
So far all interviews have been pleasant. Everyone I have encountered have been so kind and helpful to me. They make me feel like they want me to get the job.
UPDATE: Onsite interview was great. I felt that the questions were fair and everyone I met was amazing. Waiting to here back if I got the job. They said it will take 3-4 days before I receive a decision. System Design interview was fairly simple. I recommend Grokking the system design interview as a source. They don't even ask you to go as in depth as the two free examples it gives so if you can understand those very well you'll be fine. Networking interview was way simplier than I thought. It actually has nothing to do with actual networks; it was a fairly simple coding/leetcode type question.
Interview questions [3]
Question 1
Paired tech: Given an array of timepoints in 'HH:MM' format, return an array with the mininum time difference in minutes and the two time points that gave it. (didn't have to worry about warping)
Architecture: example would be designing a url shortner
Networking: think of asynch programing and how servers communicate to eachother
The time constraint on the Hackerrank screen is just not realistic and doesn't reflect what developers even do with real work. I don't understand why companies choose to screen like this. Each question has a 5-22 minute timeout and it is barely enough time to read the prompt and understand it. You have to type every character for your solution, since no copy/paste is allowed. They are not hard problems, but you are expected to come up with them cold, debug them extremely fast with hidden test cases, and not use Google or any other resources. I don't know a single dev who codes like this in the real world.
Just another company that relies on a blunt tool to filter.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Hackerrank screen questions with a very fast time limit.
I applied for a role and was contacted the following Monday by a Senior Tech Recruiter, who sent me a link to an online assessment with a 5-day deadline. I replied promptly to explain that I was unexpectedly traveling and wouldn’t be able to complete it until early the following week, and I requested an extension through end of day Tuesday.
The recruiter then sent a new link, but this one was set to expire on Tuesday morning. On Monday afternoon, I tried to access the assessment using the new link (as well as the original link and the reminder email link), and in all cases the assessment was unavailable to me. I immediately emailed the recruiter to let her know the link wasn’t working.
I heard nothing back. Instead, the next day I received an automated email stating that my time was up and my application had been closed for failure to complete the assessment. I followed up again, explaining that the link they provided was not valid at the time I was scheduled to take the test.
The only response I received was a canned message saying that they had already granted an extension, that the extended link had expired “for a second time,” and that the assessment window was now permanently closed and could not be reactivated. There was no acknowledgment that the link had been inaccessible when I tried to use it, nor any attempt to troubleshoot or reschedule.
Ridiculous, clumsy, disrespectful.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
When is the best time to send you a broken link and then ignore your attempts to resolve this issue?
I applied and heard nothing for several months. A recruiter emailed me inviting me to chat about my application several months after I applied. I had a 30 minute call with the recruiter. It was not at all conversational. Recruiter seemed very rote, scripted, and robotic, and did not inspire excitement about the company. After the call, the recruiter ghosted me.