It took two months total, starting with the recruiter and then two interviews with the team. There was a full month between each step. The interviewers seemed very disinterested. My impression was they were interviewing just to fill some sort of quota. Further, the interviewers were on the other side of the world so the times were late night for me. Finally, they didn't have the decency to send a personal email and instead sent the generic, system-generated rejection email. Overall it was a distasteful experience and a waste of my time.

Really slow process. Kept me waiting for weeks for an update. Wrong individuals interviewing me for the role. and the presentation I was asked to put together was the wrong context. The feedback at the end made no sense.

The interview process was comprehensive but marked by delays between stages, affecting the overall experience. The process began with a recruiter screen, followed by an interview with the hiring manager. This was succeeded by two 1:1 meetings with functional leaders, culminating in a virtual onsite with two SVP leaders. The style of questions throughout was predominantly behavioral and leadership-focused, akin to the STAR method used at Amazon. Each stage of the interview was conducted professionally, with engaging and thought-provoking questions. However, the time taken to receive feedback or move to the next stage was notably protracted. After the final interview stage, I found myself needing to follow up twice, and it took approximately four weeks to receive any response. This extended period of silence and the necessity of initiating follow-ups were aspects of the process that could have been managed more efficiently and respectfully. Although the interviews themselves were well-structured, focusing on behavioral and leadership skills, there was a notable lack of functional questions directly related to the role's primary responsibilities. This imbalance in the questioning style meant that my relevant functional skills in these areas were not fully explored or demonstrated. The interview panel was all men, which did not reflect well on the diversity of the team. I would have appreciated being interviewed by at least one woman! In conclusion, while the interview process was methodical and the team was professional, the experience could be significantly enhanced with more timely communication, a balanced mix of behavioral and functional questions, and a more personalized approach to conveying final decisions. This would streamline the process and provide a more complete assessment of a candidate's fit for the role.