It began with an initial phone screen with a recruiter, who recommended an onsite interview. In office, I met with the manager of the team, the team lead, and an employee who began as a CSR. I have years of experience and knowledge that made me qualified for the role, and felt that each step of my interview had gone well: building good rapport with each of the people I met with, presenting my best self, and demonstrating my strength as a candidate. I was actually shocked when I received an email from recruiting the next day, letting me know that they "weren't continuing my application." When I wrote back to the recruiter (the only point of contact for the whole process) requesting feedback as to my rejection, they stated that they weren't able to provide any, only that my application was being discontinued. I get that each company vets candidates in their own way, and makes decisions that they feel will benefit them in the long term. But when a candidate's perception of themselves is so apparently misaligned with the company's, it feels a bit like being gaslighted when they won't provide any feedback regarding the nature of their decision. Some of us are out here trying to improve their careers and grow, and would appreciate knowing what makes us so apparently unattractive as candidates - especially for entry-level roles. Virtually everything you can find about Procore is a glowing, positive review of how wonderful it is to work there, how the culture is top-notch, the people are great, everyone believes in what they do, etc. It's a big part of why I applied in the first place! But if I'm not going to be extended an offer, it would be nice to know even a little bit about why.