I applied through a recruiter. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Real in Aug 2023
Interview
Recruiter screen, then take-home coding assessment forked from CodeScreen. The exercise was to use a list of users from Github via API and build a list and detail pages with vanilla React 18 (Typescript). Fairly open-ended, use frameworks and libraries you feel comfortable with. Turn around time is 7 days, however the expected time in hours or effort is not communicated. Submitted the assessment with what I felt was pretty strong production quality code, routing with 404 & 500 error boundaries, mobile responsive using tailwindcss, and jest unit tests using @testing-library/react. Radio silence after that. Reached out to the recruiter to no avail.
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Real
Interview
First round was essentially a large take-home coding assessment; they gave you a week to do it, but very little in terms of specific requirements. I spent about 4 days on it total - I would say it was definitely within the ball-park of production quality code, and yet they passed on it without so much as saying a word -- not even any constructive criticism or anything about what they may have been looking for specifically in a solution. Personally, this smells fishy -- although I do not have proof, I would not be surprised if they are one of those companies that has no intention of hiring someone, and just send out these tests to steal code from hopeful developers who think they have a chance at getting a gig with them. Point is, STAY AWAY from this place. And tell your friends to not apply either. Also, whoever wrote the initial code for the take-home assessment (the starter code they give you before you fill in your part) should try taking his own stupid test. That code sucks. There's so many better ways of writing something like that.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Given a set of csv files with a bunch of random movie data from different places (which have different record structures / different columns), try to match those movie records from one place / csv file to another. Although, the only requirement literally states "make the test pass" - which only needs you to basically match at least one record. Stupid.
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Real
Interview
First round was essentially a large take-home coding assessment; they give you a week to do it, but very little in terms of specific requirements. I spent about 4 days on it total - I would say it was definitely within the ball-park of production quality code, and yet they passed on it without so much as saying a word -- not even any constructive criticism or anything about what they may have been looking for specifically in a solution. Personally, this smells fishy -- although I do not have proof, I would not be surprised if they are one of those companies that has no intention of hiring someone, and just send out these tests to steal code from hopeful developers who think they have a chance at getting a gig with them. Point is, STAY AWAY from this place. And tell your friends to not apply either. Also, whoever wrote the initial code for the take-home assessment (the starter code they give you before you fill in your part) should try taking his own stupid test. That code sucks. There's so many better ways of writing something like that.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Given a set of csv files with a bunch of random movie data from different places (which have different record structures / different columns), try to match those movie records from one place / csv file to another. Although, the only requirement literally states "make the test pass" - which only needs you to basically match at least one record. Stupid.