AECOM reviews

3.7

70% would recommend to a friend

(11,159 total reviews)
avatar

Troy Rudd

78% approve of CEO

61% positive business outlook

AECOM has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 11,159 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The AECOM employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Construction, Repair & Maintenance Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

11K reviews
3.0
Jul 5, 2012

A mixed bag.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The AECOM Sacramento office has some of the best people to work with. Although I no longer work for AECOM, I keep in touch with several former co-workers. Historically there were lots of ways to get involved within the office including a mentor program, happy hours, and organized lunches (not company sponsored, but a nice way to get to know co-workers).

Cons

Work-life balance can be an issues at times, particularly since the economic downturn. While core values list employees as an important asset, this is often lacking in day to day operations both in the Sacramento office and from the corporate level.

1.0
Jul 5, 2012

Is this a real company?

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Ability to work in specialized, unique project areas - Good for entry-level professionals who are looking to diversify and build up their project experience before going somewhere far, far away

Cons

- A corporate climate that has now devolved into almost satirical territory, where miserable staff wait for their days (and lives) to end. An inefficient bureaucratic structure permeates, and 'high-level' senior management is trotted out once a quarter to give rambling, nonsensical PowerPoint presentations that consist primarily of MBA jargon (e.g. best practices, centers of excellence, performance management, value-added, etc) to justify their over-inflated salaries. - Salaries for professional staff that are considerably below market rate, with the thinking that a depressed economic climate and the opportunity to work on 'sexy' projects should be sufficient. The idea that staff should 'be lucky to have a job' (said often by a number of principals) is outright offensive, and in 2012, actually no longer the case. - Many promotions and advancements are doled out based on favoritism and/or how willing you are to be your boss' lapdog. In many instances, promotions do not come with any salary adjustments, so are now just pathetic ways to placate employees for a while longer. - A company that has become overly obsessed with short-term financial results, at the expense of of creating a great company. A constant threat to be 100 percent billable has effectively disallowed to opportunity to engage in marketing efforts, training opportunities, team-building activities, etc. At this rate, bathroom breaks and sneezing will need to be billed to the client. Minimal conference fees are now routinely denied. - The dwindling lack of talent within the company, particularly at the more senior level, is now seriously affecting project work. Many principals who had something to offer have left for greener pastures, thereby leaving those without the deep skill sets to produce high-quality deliverables or the social capabilities to build a client base or motivate staff. - A company that bills itself as 'international' and 'collaborative' is anything but. Interaction across offices is minimal because the business structure disincentivizes it. The idea that many people have the opportunity to work on 'high profile' projects is unfounded, as these projects are hogged by principals who want the glory and the ability to expense foreign dinners on their corporate AmEx. - Unsurprisingly, a company that feeds out negativity from the top ends up creating corrosive office environments at the ground level, and the existing atmosphere feels like a high school cafeteria, where trash-talking others is the norm and backstabbing happens regularly. This is particularly sad, as the one supposed benefit of consulting is to be in a supportive team atmosphere. - After spending countless time and money on a 'rebranding' effort (which apparently is where everyone's bonus went), the company is still unable to cohesively present what it stands for and what it actually does. The idea that it is committed to 'sustainable environments' is hypocritical considering it actively pursues projects that are socially, economically and environmentally damaging to many communities.

1.0
Jul 3, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefit plan was good Good flexibility and work life balance (mainly because the company can't motivate or resource staff to get and execute work)

Cons

This company is entirely driven by cash flow and stock price. Opportunities for promotion are slim and shrinking. The company sets lofty goals with no plans, resources, or leadership. As such, AECOM's unfilled promises to Wall Street are killing the stock price. The company is reactionary not visionary. Unwilling to invest in hiring or training good people. Absolutely oppressive environment and demand for utilization is unrealistic given the demand for revenue generation. Morale is awful. This company was born from the clumsy merger of several other firms; therefore, management systems are repetitive, useless, or irrelevant.

Viewing 10891 - 10893 of 11,159 Reviews

Glassdoor has 12,626 AECOM reviews submitted anonymously by AECOM employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if AECOM is right for you.