employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Bridgewater Associates

Engaged Employer

Bridgewater Associates reviews

3.7

59% would recommend to a friend

(593 total reviews)
avatar

Nir Bar Dea

66% approve of CEO

50% positive business outlook

Bridgewater Associates has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 593 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Bridgewater Associates employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

593 reviews
3.0
Oct 22, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

In short, you will come out of the experience being a much better version of yourself. You will be a sharper thinker and know yourself more intimately. Details: Your cohort of colleagues are likely going to be at least one standard deviation or more above average intelligence. They will be humble, direct, and interested in sharing a core set of values. You will learn/refine how to think about things systematically and relentlessly focus on what can go wrong and what to do about it. And, most importantly you will learn a lot about yourself (some of it will be quite painful) - i.e. what you're truly good at and what aren't which can be monumental in how you shape the rest of your career and life for that matter. Other comments about pay/food/parties/etc. are all true but keep in mind that total compensation balanced with total number of work hours may not be on average that much higher (10-15%); very few people are invited to participate in long term profit sharing.

Cons

The company is generally risk averse, the principles reflect a life-long learning in investing that protects heavily against the downsides. These are extrapolated to all things at Bridgewater, and naturally you experience a cadence of large outcomes are significantly lower velocity - if you value being nimble, taking risks then this is definitely not the place for you. Ray is on a multi-year transition out of the company but as of yet has been unsuccessful at finding/fielding a successful group of capable managers who will uphold the same degree of "everything that Ray can do". Founder transitions have rarely been successful, so it begets the question of what Bridgewater may be like 5-10 years down the road. You live in a constant state of tension....the principles on the surface are very logical and appealing but if you spend enough time living them, you'll realize that it's very hard to do so. You receive 360 degree feedback daily/minutely, which can be invigorating but prevents you from having an 'off-day'. Lastly, you will definitely run across principle management ninjas who can bend/shape anything you say into something unfavorable. This is not particularly prevalent but it exists, so don't buy into the fallacy that there are no politics at the company; there are just fewer and concealed by a shrewd application of the principles (not very hard with that many super ambitious mensa types).

3.0
Jun 30, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A chance to work at one of the world's top hedge funds. Free lunches, fully-stocked snack bars and refrigerators with sodas. Can take advantage of the in-house training on courses ranging from SQL to market mechanics.

Cons

If you can't fit in with the company culture, you won't survive past 3 months. The turnover at the company is huge (30%+ in the first year), mostly because of culture incompatibility. The company advertises its culture as a true meritocracy, where anybody can call BS on anybody else, including their boss. It sounds good on paper, but what goes around comes around, and people can "drill down" on you; if you don't have a thick skin, you're a goner.

2.0
Apr 11, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

gym food transportation shuttle pay You have a desk and a phone, and a computer( with outdated tech). You get an understanding of how other people percieve you. And you can then do things to fix, how people percieve you. However how people percieve you does not = your actual strenghts and weakensses. It can be very useful to perfect how other people percieve you and make it work in your favor, - so that you can use it to succeed at other places.

Cons

BW worked well as a startup. I love debate, goal oriented and ruthless improvement and beating the competition. I enjoy making money. However, I do believe that these ends have to be pursued through honest and fair means. I realize that these convictions are quite outdated these days. During the days of Ray, BW used to be fair and honest. Ruthless, but fair and honest. Now that Ray is gone, it has lost its edge and has stagnated to become an institutionalized cesspool of cleptocrats. People mindlessly follow and execute “culture” processes, but the conviction and understanding behind the principles is no longer there. United States had good intentions and ideology too, when it first started, too. But the influence of the founders has faded, and the ideas and principles they have set forth, have been subverted, corrupted and abused by power-hungry sociopaths . The very same principles that Ray set forth to defeat dishonesty, ego and stupidity have been co-opted by self-serving managers to stifle debate and dissent. Instead of exploring weaknesses to help coach others and to drive for self-improvement, managers use a focus on weaknesses to take down people they perceive as threats and to destroy the confidence and self-worth of juniors to solidify their control over them and to boost their own egoes. Managers use debate not to find truth, but to deflect attention and blame from themselves and onto others. Instead of being managers, they have become politicians in the middle of re-election ( where re-election is every single day) , twisting words and slinging mud, aiming to take out the opponent. With electioneering happening every day, it is no wonder no work ever gets done. Imagine all the idiosyncrasy, bloat, ego, politicking, conflict of interest and bickering in the US House of Representatives. Now imagine all of that transposed onto a Hedge Fund. – well that is BW for you. If you want to learn how to be a politician debater, expert at deflecting blame to others,- then BW is right for you, and it pays better than working for the government. However, if you actually want to learn anything of substance, learn some transferable skills and get something done, then forget BW. BW is not a quick and agile firm, it is an inflexible, slow to act, soul crushing bureaucracy. True, their bureaucracy is built differently and crushes the soul differently ( other reviews have explained that in depth) than the bureaucracy at other big IB banks/institutions. However,- the end result is the same: progress and change is stifled to the max and the soul is crushed. The heavy weight of BW processes and culture creates its own kind of red tape, which is difficult to cut through to get anything done in a reasonable amount of time. Ray set out to restructure human nature in his image for his company, - but he couldn’t keep out the parasites, and the parasites have taken over the host, subverting the culture to their own purposes and sucking it dry.

Viewing 22 - 24 of 593 Reviews

Glassdoor has 679 Bridgewater Associates reviews submitted anonymously by Bridgewater Associates employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Bridgewater Associates is right for you.