CKM Analytix reviews

2.9

40% would recommend to a friend

(17 total reviews)
avatar

Brian Seidman

Not enough data to show CEO approval

35% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

17 reviews

Reviews about "Culture"

Return to all reviews
2.0
Jun 13, 2019

Launchpad into data science, but company has critical issues to address

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great launchpad into a career in data science. Centrally located office with good perks (amenities, snacks, social events). Generous benefits relative to companies offering pay in a similar range with comprehensive health care plan. Work can be fun and interesting if you are some combination of lucky and smart. There is a lot that a new joiner can learn. Genuinely great colleagues in general, though many, many have left in recent months and the company culture is constantly changing.

Cons

1. Whatever issues management is having in terms of making real sales and keeping clients in the past year, the pressure is flowing downstream. Managers are pressed to deliver features for an internal product to bring in sales leads. Some don't handle that stress well, which directly affects data scientists working for said managers. Much ego the higher up you go in the company, with notable exceptions. 2. Pyramid organizational structure, with not much room for career progression within CKM for the majority of data scientists at the foundation of the company. Yes, we are functionally a management consulting company, despite what we sometimes think of ourselves. Yes, consulting companies have high entry-level staff turnover. Yes, for every data scientist who leaves CKM, the company can hire an eager, fresh university/bootcamp graduate to serve the same function. But what an employee leaves with them is not just how to make a powerpoint stack, but also the technical ability to write decent code, creative means to tackle a data science problem, and experience with the sort of datasets the company leverages from. That takes time to cultivate. I am appreciative of education stipends and the training modules in development and knowledge sharing efforts, but the continuing loss of technical talent leads to a very real ceiling in the ability to solve problems that company thinks it needs to. 3. Unprofessional communication from management and HR regarding salary at the beginning of the year and, apparently, H-1B sponsorship to many who were led to believe the company would sponsor them this year at time of hire. The recently published employee handbooks were supposed to have answered these points, but do so vaguely.

2.0
May 22, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to start your career and get hands on experience. Many people are able to leverage their experience here into great data science and engineering roles.

Cons

Management seems lost on the direction of the company. There is talk about a "product" that doesn't exist. We lost our biggest client and most people now work on "internal projects" that have very little practical application. The culture can be toxic at times. With a few notable exceptions, managers have large egos and poor management skills, which is not so surprising given the lack of experience. For some reason, we only recently hired an HR person, but still are super unprofessional when it comes to dealing with HR issues. Pay is probably as low as you'll find for a data scientist in NYC (start around 70k, top out in the 90s).

2.0
Apr 30, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Because of the small size, there are opportunities for even junior people to contribute ideas and in rare cases, bring in and lead (pro bono) projects. The office space has improved greatly over time, and individuals have a lot of say in shaping the culture and perks, but management is generally pretty economically minded. That being said, compensation is pretty reasonable, keeping in mind that titles at CKM tend to be inflated relative to hierarchies at more established companies doing data science operating within tech and consulting (e.g. Data Scientists are usually more like Data Analysts (tech), (Managing) Principals to (Senior) Associate/Consultants (consulting), etc.). CKM can be a good stepping stone to something better, but it depends a lot on the type of person you are. The burden is very much on you to push yourself if you want to gain skills or work on things that interest you specifically, and sometimes the politics won’t work in your favor. Technical mentorship is quite lacking (see Cons), so many things can only be self-taught, but there is room for taking time to do that for yourself within the job if you can demonstrate a compelling case for it. Support largely depends on your team/manager, and like anywhere, a bad manager can ruin your experience on a project. CKM does not foster a competitive culture necessarily (and far from cutthroat), but you will run into egos more and more as you move up.

Cons

It’s clear that management doesn’t believe in the importance of investing in technical leadership, which places a lower ceiling on technical growth. In recent years, CKM has relied more and more on filling manager positions with people that started out as entry-level hires at the company (mostly bootcamp and uni grads with some Master’s degrees sprinkled in) who have gained relative seniority through their longer tenures. The few folks who previously came in as more experienced hires (Ph.D, previous experience in other industries) have mostly left over time, yet CKM has seemed to prefer to bootstrap these types of vacancies instead of filling them with people who have comparable backgrounds. Over time, this has created a dearth of technical expertise and depth, which can lead to an incredibly inefficient pace of learning with little to no exposure to best practices. Exacerbating this, there is a concerning lack of humility in parts of the company, which can stifle growth and cause conflict when egos are threatened. Most of the people at all levels of the company are fairly immature in their careers, and it can feel cliquey and sometimes like playing favorites. As a result, the culture of the company can be a bit petty and childish. Management can be a bit buzzword-oriented at times, which obscures the reality that there is simply a lot of low-hanging fruit out there that CKM is simply well-positioned to tackle. Despite what you might be told in the hiring process, most projects will have you doing low-level work that would not likely qualify as data science in roles outside of CKM. If your goal is to do actual data science work, you’ll probably have to work much harder to teach yourself the same things at CKM that you would learn naturally on the job at a more established tech, finance, or consulting company (listing these industries, as this is where most people seem to come from/go at the company). At the same time, CKM also does not provide the same kind of top-to-bottom hands-on experience that one generally gets from working at a small startup, so I would not recommend CKM as a place for long-term growth as a data scientist.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 17 Reviews

Glassdoor has 34 CKM Analytix reviews submitted anonymously by CKM Analytix employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if CKM Analytix is right for you.