Capital One reviews

Favoritism, Tech company but no respect for tech engineers, top down thinking, little space for innovation because most of the time you spend on making decks for VP+ for their Executive meeting. And remaining time you spend solving tech Vs product politics. Performance Management process need so much improvement in terms of stack ranking associates per their strengths and not because favorite of D+ community

I have never seen a company offer so much promise based on its reputation, and then succeed in beating the potential and enthusiasm out of highly capable people. I have worked at several companies during my career and see the specific problems at Capital One as: 1) "Tell me what I want to hear" - the senior-most leaders are so sure that "what got them here will get them there" that they only want to listen to people who use the exact same kind of language, communication style, and ideas. 2) The emperor has no clothes - This follows from #1 above. Leaders don't want to listen to ideas from people who have gained expertise in other banks. They are rewarded for being generalists and lack depth of expertise - yet they do not want to leverage the people who do have that expertise, for fear they'll be overshadowed. 3) Lack of maturity in people leadership - Little weight is placed on the maturity of people leadership skills and talent development, even at the executive levels. This leads to short-sighted org decisions, lack of investment in talent hired from the outside, and external hires at all levels feeling like they're not fully utilized or challenged. 4) Performance management - claims to be objective and transparent but is very susceptible to favoritism and disproportionately rewards loyalty above other factors. Old timers at the company heavily favor other old timers. 5) Cultural hubris - Only Capital One experience counts. Only Capital One has a "high bar for talent". Skills built at other institutions aren't recognized and made use of.