Cargill reviews

4.0

76% would recommend to a friend

(5,806 total reviews)
avatar

Brian Sikes

69% approve of CEO

60% positive business outlook

Cargill has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 5,806 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Cargill employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

6K reviews
3.0
Jun 3, 2015

Not what it used to be

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Large company, so lots of opportunities. Good things to learn in the right BU's, but it only goes so far. See my comments in the Cons. I was normally on the higher end of the performers based upon my reviews, so I was moved into decent roles. So I may have had it better than some, but still saw the shortcomings as well. I gave the company a 3 because I was put into some good groups and learned some great things while I was there. That being said, almost everyone I worked with in those groups (especially the high performers) have long since moved on to better things.

Cons

Pay is low for many positions. Moving into a similar role at a tiny company, I saw a large increase in pay. All jobs since have paid much better (upwards of 40% higher than the same role at Cargill in some instances). Cargill used to be known for stability, which offset the pay concerns. However, the last half of my tenure there showed that all of that changed. High bars were set on company performance based on pre-recession numbers. During the recession the company started a poorly planned corporate wide project with a very high burn rate, then started cutting people afterwards because the lofty financial goals were not met. That job cut was poorly handled and those of us left had to get by with some of the best talent gone. Job cuts since show a trend for caring less and less about the employee as a person and lack of accountability of decision makers regarding WHY job cuts are now "needed". WAY too much time wasted in the company on trendy corp initiatives, like safety committees in the office settings (in the plants this is much more needed) that had to really stretch to find something to do, like one group asking employees on the safety committee to play traffic cop and write fake tickets to people seen driving too fast in the ramp. Waste of valuable time. Too many committees in general. Makes you wonder how some of the people ever got their actual jobs done. This is probably more big company in general, but for young folks with technical backgrounds, staying too long at a company like this really sets you behind the pace. You can learn so much more at a smaller, faster paced company. There are great things to learn at Cargill (and moreso if you stay strictly on the business or finance side) but you can only go so long and feel like you are stretching your boundaries and furthering your career. Felt like I gained back 10 years of knowledge the first year out. People placed into roles WAY too much based upon who they are and who they know. Too many "managers" have to be told how to handle situations by the people they manage. IT management is full of this. A few strong ones, many, many more that are not fit for that level of leadership.

1.0
Dec 26, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Large organization; very longstanding presence. Global operations - so potential opportunity to experience work in various portions of the globe.

Cons

Tenure is valued FAR more than anything else. Many senior leaders have been in their roles for many, many years - a result of their having been promoted well beyond their capabilities. However, the Cargill culture is that "If you've been with the company 20+ years, you MUST be a good guy..." Conversely, if you've come from outside the company, your talents, efforts, actual results (should anyone bother to notice those) are discounted. After all, if you've not been there a couple of decades, you're simply assumed to be clueless. I've worked for a number of multi-billion-dollar public companies - and Cargill, or at least the portion of it that I experienced, has by far the weakest, most insecure, least professional, and most inbred management team of all. I cannot, in good conscience, recommend Cargill as an employer. Join at your own risk!

1.0
Jun 6, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

nice people, easy place to work, easy to collect a pay check, no sense of urgency.....always "it can get done tomorrow" culture so limited stress....

Cons

Too many to list...If you want to step back in time then Cargill is the place to work. Show-up, Shut-up and leave culture. Easy place to collect a pay check and not push yourself. Actually don't push at Cargill because the culture does not reward different thought process. No professional or intellectual diversity.....almost comical how arrogant and out of touch the people company is with modern business. New ideas are challenged and generally not accepted as Cargill's approach to business very "top down" and becomes obvious that new, outside ideas are politely pushed aside.... Traders and most of the employees at Cargill have limited math, and no technical capabilities. If you know math and have programming skills one can get away with murder at Cargill because no one will understand what your doing. Lots of people doing the same same way because lack of intellectual diversity forces mediocrity. A few bright spots but overall Cargill is what one expects. An old firm where the culture supports mediocrity and the status quo.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 5,806 Reviews

Glassdoor has 10,036 Cargill reviews submitted anonymously by Cargill employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Cargill is right for you.