Cell Press reviews

3.5

78% would recommend to a friend

(44 total reviews)

Emilie Marcus

67% approve of CEO

76% positive business outlook

Cell Press has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 44 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Cell Press employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

44 reviews
4.0
Aug 23, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart colleagues and interesting work. Able to drive projects of interest or focus on key role, depending on interests. Conference travel is fun as an editor.

Cons

Company does not work hard to retain talent. Could be more flexible with remote work, particularly given the nature of the job. Pay is on the low side for this area.

4.0
Jan 4, 2017

Scientific Editor

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people are the best part of Cell Press. They really care about the scientific rigor and accuracy of what they are doing. And they do their best to have a good time along the way.

Cons

New, dynamic projects are encouraged from management, but the heavy workload prevents time to be able to act on ideas.

3.0
Jul 27, 2016

Production employee

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people. Extremely flexible work schedule.

Cons

Persistent "us vs. them" mentality with parent company Elsevier. Senior Management often scapegoats "hard" decisions and unpopular policy on higher-ups and then get defensive when asked about it. Extremely busy schedule. Also, Cell Press is far behind most companies when it comes to technology.

Viewing 34 - 36 of 44 Reviews

Glassdoor has 48 Cell Press reviews submitted anonymously by Cell Press employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Cell Press is right for you.