Cengage Development Editor reviews

2.4

7% would recommend to a friend

(28 total reviews)
avatar

Michael Hansen

99% approve of CEO

1% positive business outlook

Development Editor employees have rated Cengage with 2.4 out of 5 stars, based on 28 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Development Editor professionals have an average working experience there. Cengage is rated 35% below average by Development Editor professionals compared to other employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

28 reviews
1.0
Jul 12, 2017

Below avg. company

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice Salary and nothing else.

Cons

People with 3-4 years of experience in publishing becomes AGM. A production editor becomes Publishing Manager and doing Acquisitions. Favoritism and bootlicking are prevalent here. People with no market knowledge are made managers in the editorial department. No proper emphasis on the development of the book. Just publishing a high number of titles is the goal. Worst company to work for in terms of learning.

3.0
Jun 29, 2016

Not what it used to be

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Cengage Learning is not what it used to be, but that is a good thing! This 100+ year old textbook company is finally becoming a technology company after years of giving the notion lip service. Cengage is working hard to remain relevant in the ever changing textbook publishing industry. The jury is out, but I hope they can make a successful transition .

Cons

Cengage is not what it used to be, but that is a bad thing! More and more key roles are moving out of the Mason to either the east or west coast. It feels like the Mason office is slowly being dismantled and probably won't be around in a few years.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 28 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,611 Cengage reviews submitted anonymously by Cengage employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Cengage is right for you.