Cengage reviews

2.8

29% would recommend to a friend

(2,413 total reviews)
avatar

Michael Hansen

36% approve of CEO

23% positive business outlook

Cengage has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 2,413 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Cengage employee rating is 25% below average for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
Apr 10, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I'd say the best part of working here is generally the people I work with. It's great seeing the company turn a corner, and try to innovate in the ed tech market as well.

Cons

I am extremely underpaid, over-worked and I constantly feel like I'm being taken advantage of. After working here for a few years with increasing responsibility I feel like I haven't seen any benefit on my end. There is no way for me to advance by merit in my current position and the openings for promotions are far and few between and very competitive to get. If I was doing what I was doing at any other company I would be paid nearly twice as much. I am almost always doing my job and someone else's job due to the high turnover for the last few years.

avatar
Cengage Response
12y
Thanks for your feedback. I agree we have great people, and I’m disappointed to hear that you feel there isn’t opportunity here for advancement. We’ve had a high and growing number of internal promotions in the US since Jan. 1. You’re right – it’s competitive, but that’s a good sign for us and speaks to the quality of our teams. Playing politics is not a culture we embrace here. I’d encourage you to speak with your manager and/or HR regarding your perspective – we might be able to get to the bottom of this if you share specifics. Thanks.
4.0
Apr 10, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

My manager is excellent. He is hands off, respects his reports' autonomy and understands and is accommodating to external demands. He regularly checks in but generally stays out of the way unless we need his help. To his credit, he's built a cohesive team of highly independent reports who are self managing so they require minimal oversight. Work-life balance is very good and benefits I find to be good as well. For the most part I've found the work here doesn't get in the way of life, but is rather a well incorporated part of it. The work environment is casual and relaxed yet challenging, but seldom uncomfortably demanding. When we are here, we work hard, but we all "leave work" at the end of the day. The product teams I interact with are understanding and respective of our workload and very collaborative. Contractors in my group (many of whom have been with us for a long time) are regarded equally as peers. The office space is comfortable and relaxed with a number of social activities throughout the year. Much of the staff in this location occupy private offices which is a significant contribution towards productivity (particularly to engineering staff). I have worked in both a cubical and had the privilege of a private office and I personally feel much more respected having an office. Given the breadth of disciplines for which we produce products, the projects we work on can vary greatly in topic. This helps to keep things interesting. The company encourages us to seek out areas of personal interest to which we can contribute.

Cons

It feels like the technology organization within the company is still finding its footing. There have been several rounds of structural reorganization as they try to figure out where roles fit. Some individuals responsible for product development are still struggling to "think digital". -= Process =- The biggest problem I've experienced is the epidemic of subjecting digital product creation to the same work flows used for creating books. Many (probably most) of the systems and processes originally developed for the production of book products simply do not fit with digital product development and are considerably more of a hindrance than anything else. The company needs to put more effort into streamlining the process of "publishing" digital products. We can't produce rapidly using these old methods. Time to market is always an influence but is hampered by process. -= Tools =- Similar to the problem with product creation work flows, some of us aren't producing books, we're building software. We need appropriate tools to do so. Information workers need computers that can do more than run the MS Office suite and the minimally demanding line of business programs. Graphic designers get high end Macs with huge displays. The software engineers should be getting powerful computers with lots of CPU horsepower, memory and disk space. We shovel a lot of bytes around. -= Talent acquisition =- On several occasions we have lost very good candidates due to limitations that just shouldn't be. A great software engineer is many times more productive than a mediocre one, but very seldom costs many times as much. Reasonable salaries that are a bit outside the norm shouldn't be preventing us from obtaining the best talent we can. Off site employees also should be an option. While I recognize that on premise is often best, remote excellence beats out local mediocrity any day. -= Hub office gravitation =- One of my fears is the future of the smaller offices that exist outside the big metro areas. There is a clear intent to grow the Boston and San Francisco offices. While I'm all for expanding those since they are surrounded by such great pools of talent, don't discount talent in the outlying areas. Some of the best work (as recognized by upper management) has come out of the smaller locations. -= Skill and performance enhancement =- Every year, the sales departments have conferences to boast about their performance and learn from each other. The technical departments don't have these kinds of gatherings, nor does the company send technical staffers to appropriate technical conferences to accomplish similar things (learn and share).

avatar
Cengage Response
12y
Thanks for your thoughtful feedback. I appreciate the time you took to address both the positives you see and your concerns. I agree that we need to update some of our backend systems, and we’re working on that now – as well as finding creative workarounds when possible. In addition, I absolutely support finding good talent and keeping our technology workforce sharp. I’ll speak to George (our CTO) about this – I know he feels similarly. If there is a good growth/development opportunity that serves your work and the business, please bring it up to your manager. While we can’t accommodate every request, sometimes all you have to do is ask.
4.0
Apr 10, 2014

We are headed in the right direction.

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Many interesting challenges and opportunities as we continue our transition to a digital company. We have senior management that understands what is necessary and are making positive changes.

Cons

As with many large corporations, the culture and workflows tend to get bogged down by bureaucracy.

Viewing 2125 - 2127 of 2,413 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,611 Cengage reviews submitted anonymously by Cengage employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Cengage is right for you.