Center for Internet Security reviews

The company suffers from a serious executive leadership problem that has significantly damaged employee trust and morale. A large number of employees were laid off, followed shortly by the hiring of multiple new executives. This sequence was difficult for employees to reconcile and created the perception that financial decisions were not aligned with stated priorities or operational realities. Decision-making at the top appears to be driven more by personal preference and executive relationships than by data, performance metrics, or clearly articulated business strategy. Certain executives and initiatives receive strong support regardless of outcomes, while others are deprioritized without transparent explanation. As a result, confidence in the executive leadership team is extremely low across much of the organization, especially of the CEO. While individual executives may be capable, the overall team appears constrained by a culture where dissent is discouraged and alignment is enforced rather than earned. This has led to an environment where employees feel unheard, uncertain about the future, and disconnected from leadership decisions that directly affect their work and livelihoods.

Pay is far below industry standards, especially if working from an expensive part of the country, leadership in many depts is cripplingly indecisive, no real product/service pipeline, most leaders promoted from inside the company and long tenured are incompetent.