employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Central Park Conservancy

Is this your company?

Central Park Conservancy reviews

3.1

32% would recommend to a friend

(103 total reviews)

Douglas Blonsky

18% approve of CEO

30% positive business outlook

Central Park Conservancy has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 103 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Central Park Conservancy employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

103 reviews
1.0
Jun 19, 2017

Exasperating environment

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Park. The People. The diversity of staff. Good people are slowly rising through the ranks, and if they can keep from becoming indoctrinated into the CPC way, it could be an amazing place.

Cons

Over the arc of my time employed at the park, I observed many shifts in the way management conducted themselves and how they set out to manage both the staff and the park itself. Like any other place of employment, you can always find something wrong with how things are done. Unlike every other workplace, the open hostility and the environment which was fostered there was extreme. For a long time gaslighting, heavy pressure, and nonsensical directives were the primary management style. If you hadn’t had experience working with other companies or were susceptible to intimidation tactics, it was easy to fall prey to this psychological manipulation. Managers would expressly tell me to not email them with updates about specific issues. Why do you ask? This would be because they didn’t want a record of asking you to do something and it being done as requested. Or that you questioned why it should be done in a certain way, because that would show that you did, in fact, think about the efficiency of how to tackle your work. Most times they wanted “no-email-trails” because they were reacting to their bosses who just wanted it to get done without regard for safety, efficiency, or the expertise of the staff member they hired with said expertise. *Fun Fact: my boss had no idea what was on my resume and what kind of expertise I had to offer. * Those no-email-trail requests were always way too shady for me to accept, so whenever possible I would write long, explanatory emails detailing everything. Sure, I got chastised for it, but what else could they do about it. Continue to do this if you presently work there, or are hired. Trust me, it saved my butt many a time from their gaslighting. I was warned when I was hired there was a good ol’ boy mentality there. Now it has broken up between recent retirements, layoffs, and the president “stepping down.” Three are left standing. One reports directly to another who is now in charge. He even had to do his bidding in meetings with field staff to ask them to post reviews on here. What a dumb idea. It smacked of a backfire as soon as I heard it was happening. COO and CFO if you are reading this (I bet you are) what did you expect? By announcing it word spread and a fire was lit. The meetings to ask staff to post just added fuel to the fire. And here we are. The board is pissed because of the negativity surrounding your ineptitude at keeping the staff happy. Good ol’ boy #1 is leaving. Good ol’ boys #2 and #3 are now in charge. You say the reason for the lay-offs was reducing the budget. I believe that. What I can’t believe is that you are still trying to spin stories to the remaining staff that it was to foster a better environment for communication; to break down silos. Pick a lane, guys. This in a nutshell is why things are falling apart. Maybe it’s time for the union to come back in and give it one more college try.

1.0
Aug 14, 2017

Not what it seems

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

CPC is an organization that was founded to maintain Central Park after years of neglect by the NYC Parks Department. The mission continues only because of a few loyal, dedicated and professional staff members.

Cons

At a recent “employee engagement” only members of the senior staff spoke on stage. You wouldn’t know by looking at the stage that there are women VP’s on the senior staff: a senior staff consisting of 3 men and 3 women. The only people on the stage speaking were the: President (male), CFO (male) and COO (male). If that doesn’t tell you what kind of organization this is, nothing will. Merit pay does not exist. They follow NYC/Park rules for raises not because they have to, but because they want the disparity in pay. The senior staff believes that they are the only reason the Park looks great and not the people who actually work in the park. This leads to a lack of caring by middle management. They do not hold employees accountable for their lack of work performance. And sadly, HR promotes this as well. HR exists only to protect the senior staff. They do not help or support middle management and below. Certain departments are never culled for poor performance. It’s baffling to watch certain department leaders continue to tolerate employees who are late every day and when they do show up, do very little work or are unable to complete simple work related tasks. This happens in many departments but most notably in HR, Finance and PDC. 10% of the employees at the corporate office could be terminated and work would continue as usual. And yet, the recent round of firings mainly targeted 1 department and left the corporate offices controlled by the CFO and COO virtually untouched. Bad leadership allows poor performance to continue and resentment to fester for those who actually want to work. Allowing “favor” hires for non-existing positions just to appease donors also produces resentment. No one wants to work with someone who was hired as a favor. Chances are, they have no clue how to do their job and are just showing up for a paycheck (or food in some cases). Ironically, they prefer to hire former NYC Parks employees. They prefer to hire employees from the very same organization that could not manage the park and in fact, destroyed the park. And they promote them to higher positions than what they qualify for. The obsession with hiring parks employees will be the downfall of CPC. They should also stop using surveys and consultants only to be told that the senior staff is the problem and then do nothing about it. How many employee surveys do they need before the reality of how bad things are begins to sink in? If you don’t want to know the truth, stop with the anonymous surveys. You know the truth, deal with it. And the employees have finally realized they are not anonymous and no longer want to do them. After the recent round of firings in which 8% of the staff was fired, it is interesting to note that news articles stated the Board members were displeased with the negative reviews on Glassdoor. Many of the negative reviews were directed at the President, CFO and COO, yet they all remain with the company. So what exactly was accomplished? Have the overpaid top 3 senior staff (all males) eliminated after a devastating financial loss last year and negative reviews? No. Instead, the Board allowed the same people who received the most complaints to decide who would be fired. If money was the issue for the layoffs, shouldn’t they have targeted the highest paid employees with the most complaints who actually caused the financial loss? How about targeting the senior staff that have exceeded their usefulness, hold long standing grudges, and have become obstructionists with bloated unreasonable salaries? The Board has saved the very people who are destroying the organization. Does the Board think that the guy who picked up garbage in the Park was fired by the COO because he was responsible for the $40m loss last year?

1.0
May 19, 2017

Contemplating compensation

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I can't say enough about my coworkers. They are some of the best, most dedicated, and brightest people I've had the pleasure to work with in my career.

Cons

This is just a preamble to a more in-depth review. I just want everyone still working there, and those potential candidates to really think about this. This is a non-profit park. I should qualify that, it is a for-profit for the upper tier of management. It is non-profit for the rest of us. Just so you know, entry level salaries can be in the low 30k range. Management has implemented salary caps. There are no merit increases. Here's the salary (public knowledge) of the three top positions: CEO: 717,055 CFO: 414,499 COO: 347,319* *keep in mind this was FY 2015, he’s been since promoted to COO since then so it’s likely much more Just google central park conservancy IRS990 and the financial year. The most recently available one was 2015. You can see the salaries of all the senior management on here. Down to AVPs. Do you think they gave themselves salary caps like they did for field staff? I don’t think so.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 103 Reviews

Glassdoor has 126 Central Park Conservancy reviews submitted anonymously by Central Park Conservancy employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Central Park Conservancy is right for you.