employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Charles River Associates

Engaged Employer

Charles River Associates reviews

4.0

74% would recommend to a friend

(603 total reviews)
avatar

Paul Maleh

71% approve of CEO

70% positive business outlook

Charles River Associates has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 603 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Charles River Associates employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

603 reviews
3.0
May 17, 2019

It Depends

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people are great, generally very supportive and friendly. If junior staffers find one or two senior staff that they can build a strong relationship with, it will open many doors (including some exciting professional opportunities)! At its best, working for CRA is an ideal first job for someone with an economics and quantitative background who is still debating their long-term career plans. It can be a great opportunity to learn in a fun and friendly environment, while preparing for the next step in your career. Plus, alumni have a great track record of going to top-tier graduate programs in business, law, public policy, and more!

Cons

A junior staffer's experience is entirely dependent on the practice group, and sometimes also on the office location and specific project teams. For example, some practices (i.e., Energy, Life Sciences) generally offer opportunities for significant professional growth, advancement within the firm, client interaction, and significant ownership of project work - all while building industry-specific expertise and maintaining generally good work-life balance. However, in other practices (i.e., Antitrust & Competition) this is more uncommon and difficult to achieve. Growth opportunities are limited after the first two years. Work-life balance can be non-existent at times (with some offices being far worse than others). The bonus compensation scheme is a black box, and incentives across the board are misaligned for junior staffers. Late-night and weekend work is often expected of junior staff, despite not receiving any additional incentives apart from being told "people will notice you working hard." Project staffing is ad hoc and dependent on a semi-official junior staff "scheduler" in each office to volunteer their time to try to create some order and balance. Due to the flat and unstructured hierarchy, expanding your responsibilities beyond the second year is entirely dependent on finding someone who is willing to delegate to you. Without such a patron, the job can turn into a meditative plug-and-chug. Meanwhile, supervisors are unable to provide concrete support and guidance, as they often don't work directly with their supervisees. At its worst, if you stay more than two years, the job can be extremely frustrating as you struggle to find opportunities for professional growth and maintain a semblance of work-life balance, all while hoping your annual bonus isn't completely deflated by the one or two slow weeks you had a few months ago.

2.0
May 14, 2015

1st year analst

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- employment - relatively good co - workers - learn how to work with unprofessional people - learn how to use Stata, SAS, and R possibly ( the use of R is actually useful) - compensation is above accounting and IT consulting -

Cons

I'll break this down into 3 components: work life/culture/seniormanagement, exit opportunities, advice to potential recruits 1. Work Life/Culture/ Senior Management CRA primarily works in the context of litigation consulting, most people here would much rather be in management consulting ( I know I would). That being said, work life here can be difficult, you're dealing with experts, lawyers, HR, and project managers that had phD' with no idea how to lead. The cases (usually the defendant) hires their counsel (lawyers) who then hire experts (CRA). Often times our clients are not in the complete right, so you'll often have a hard time morally justifying your work. The skills you learn are not useful at all in today's business environment, outside of academia or economic consulting. SAS MIGHT be useful, but chances are you won't need it. R is extremely useful for alot of jobs but its difficult to learn and your ability to learn it while working here is determined by whether you need it or not. 2. exit opps as touched on earlier, you don't gain as much skills that are transferable as in management consulting. From management consulting, you can go to PE, VC, Banking, MBA, corp dev, econ consulting (idk why you would), etc. From economic consulting, you can essentially only continue with econ consulting, or go to some type of school (MBA,Law, phD). Your skill set just isn't applicable for most jobs, as most jobs don't have a legal component to it. Not to mention that the analysis you do is backwards thinking (since its after the fact) 3. advice to potential recruits CRA would be a good place if you only want to work at one place before you go off to bschool or something else. If you do decide to work here (or forced to as in my case) don't stay longer than a year, the older you get, the less employable you become (many others have said this for economic consulting, not just CRA specifically)

3.0
Mar 26, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Excellent exit opportunities - The junior staff is great

Cons

- Conditions for junior staff in the office location that I work in have been grim (at least 5 out of the 12 junior employees are planning to leave the firm in the summer of 2019) - Pay is very stingy and bonuses are extremely pathetic - The senior staff (employees with PhDs) is sometimes rude, too demanding, or even manipulative - There is no incentive to work late or weekends but you are expected to do it - The work is often very labor-intensive. The job is not as intellectually stimulating as it is pitched to be - Staffing on projects is very unorganized. Employees are randomly staffed on projects simply based on their availability.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 603 Reviews

Glassdoor has 670 Charles River Associates reviews submitted anonymously by Charles River Associates employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Charles River Associates is right for you.