employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Cirrus Aircraft

Is this your company?

Cirrus Aircraft reviews

3.5

65% would recommend to a friend

(213 total reviews)
avatar

Zean Nielsen

64% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

Cirrus Aircraft has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 213 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Cirrus Aircraft employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

213 reviews
2.0
Oct 5, 2021

Below average workplace

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people are generally all friendly and it's easy to make work friends here. This is the sole reason why they have been runner up for best workplace culture in the northland. But culture is more about the people you work with, it's also about having strong leadership, which Cirrus doesn't.

Cons

Cirrus talks about being such an innovative company, but the reality is they operate very old school. It feels like you've gone back in time 10-15 years being here. The turnover is high because they're too stubborn to offer compensation that meets the market, they suffocate their employees by micromanaging them, not trusting them, nor respecting them. Leadership is constantly focused on minor inconspicuous things their employees do wrong, but never give them recognition for things they do right, big or small. Incidentally, the engagement and morale is low. Leadership is very top heavy, with their pay being significantly above market. Huge disparity between entry/mid level roles and directors and executives. They could really use a revamp of their compensation plan to make it more equitable. There's too much work to go around, due to having inefficient processes, mostly. So there's forced overtime for everyone across the board, whether you're hourly or salary. No one takes the time to strategize process improvement, which is why they're still stuck 10-15 years in the past.

1.0
Dec 15, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The product is very cool. Flight training is offered but there is a waiting list, a very long waiting list.

Cons

The IT department is run by Michelle Roemer who lacks industry knowledge. Most solutions are being implemented by outside contractors yet support is being done by a small handful of internal employees who's titles don't match their job duties. Redundant system (2 CRMs, 3 separate ticketing systems, 4 CMSs.) Outdated software (ERP system that is so old the vendor gave up the source code in lieu of continued support.) Lack of advancement potential (there are 3 directors that manage everyone, no other hierarchy in place currently.) Lack of structure (currently planning a department restructure that is unlike anything I have seen before, quite honestly I am not sure where the idea for this "new" structure came from, it will absolutely solve none of the issues I am describing here and just proves Michelle's lack of knowledge.) Solutions are over complicated and being released unfinished. Also being misrepresented as complete to the rest of the company. Lack of process, documentation and overall organization. Department is completely reactionary and lacks direction and vision. DO NOT TAKE A SALESFORCE POSITION AT THIS COMPANY IF YOU INTERVIEW WITH MICHELLE ROEMER SHE WANTS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SALESFORCE PLATFORM!! "If someone had told me this information before I was hired here I would have never left my old company!". Please don't be another one of us who says these words, currently 5 and counting.....

3.0
Jan 5, 2015

Roller Coaster

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Great co-workers, some of the easiest to get along with and more genuine people I've worked with. -The town, Duluth is a great outdoorsy city (but you better like winter, like nine consecutive months of it with long stints of sub zero weather). -Small company atmosphere where young engineers can get great, hands on experience and ownership/responsibility (probably too much).

Cons

-Benefits: I know it's general aviation, but pay is severely low and the COL of Duluth is actually not that low (which is somewhat ironic considering the price point of the planes they build), 401k matching takes an entire year to kick in, vacation is comical (40 hours total for your first TWO years - if you're allowed to take any). -Life/work balance: the jet program is in survival mode after the program was scrapped for several years, only a handful of the original engineers were kept on and then they re-started the program and hired the entire jet dpt. after they were bought up by a Chinese company (who's ownership and long term plans are not the most transparent to say the least). With customers deposits still in place the new team has had to keep up the original timeline with a bulk of the new employees being fresh out of school or laid off from other industries with very limited aircraft experience overall (very low budget operation). The jet program is kind of like a start-up without the fun, perks, or talent. Weekends are very common and 6-10's are very common in crunch time for several consecutive weeks (which is unfortunate bc most employees are young parents). Don't be surprised if you work a lot of 60-70 hour weeks until the jet is fully certified. -Employee development: there is absolutely no training and it is sink or swim, you will likely not even get an annual review, and if you do what you say will not matter as you will be placed where the company needs you not where your interests lie. There is no career/employee development plans, and if you get ahead on your project you will placed on random assignments not remotely related to your background. Very limited opportunities to move around within the company, so you better enjoy you dpt. for years. -Culture: Rather contentious - there seems to be some bad blood left from the massive lay-offs several years ago still lingering in the air. Some of the techs are really hard to work with (probably a result of being worked like dogs for too long). Not many people are really into the company or product, just there for a paycheck it seems or if they're really into aviation. Communication and teamwork across design groups is severely lacking and dysfunctional - it's usually who gets there first wins, not necessarily the best design bc of the time crunch everyone's working under. Engineering management can be very difficult to work with, would recommend working with the airframe structure groups as their leads are more hands on and provide better guidance. There is seldom praise for a job well done from engineering management, and a weird amount of overly-critical feedback for such a inexperienced team (you'd be surprised how a positive/fun work environment can influence ppl's work quality). Employees are skittish about potential lay-offs if Caiga milestones are not met or after the jet program is completed. -Process: There is large lack of oversight in the engineering and design process, and young engineers are thrown to the wolves and have to make engineering calls that could be very detrimental long-term. Unsafe design practices are not uncommon and a majority of employees would probably not feel safe flying in this aircraft. Very much a cowboy-shooting from the hip environment. Re-cap: if you're fresh out of school or really into aviation this could get a good start to get some experience, and then move on to a company that treats their employees better.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 213 Reviews

Glassdoor has 236 Cirrus Aircraft reviews submitted anonymously by Cirrus Aircraft employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Cirrus Aircraft is right for you.