Citizens reviews

3.8

74% would recommend to a friend

(4,790 total reviews)
avatar

Bruce Van Saun

85% approve of CEO

65% positive business outlook

Citizens has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 4,790 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Citizens employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

5K reviews
3.0
Sep 5, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

the culture and the people are wonderful, work life balance is very good

Cons

the entire compensation package (base, bonus, benefits) is below market (at least for back-office personnel)

avatar
Citizens Response
9mo
Thank you for recognizing our culture and work-life balance. A lot of research goes into the setting of sales goals and the majority of our colleagues achieve those goals. Anything that is not in the best interests of the customer is not acceptable. If you'd like to share your concerns more, we encourage you to email Citizens’ HR Service Center (hrservicecenter@citizensbank.com).
3.0
Sep 3, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Ability to work on projects, there were some good managers.

Cons

Some management is highly unfunctional.

avatar
Citizens Response
9mo
Thank you for your feedback. We’re glad you valued the project opportunities and supportive managers.
3.0
Sep 2, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Once you find your work family, they definitely keep you sane in an uncertain environment.

Cons

The Talent Acquisition team is responsible for attracting new talent and presenting the organization’s Employee Value Proposition (EVP). However, the internal experience within the department stands in sharp contrast to this external message. Colleagues report being treated as if they are at the team’s disposal, with instances of unprofessional communication that at times borders on verbal mistreatment. This creates a culture of fear rather than collaboration. Leadership within Talent Acquisition appears to fall short in several key areas: • Accountability & Fairness: Decisions around promotions often lack transparency, with individuals elevated into roles despite limited experience, leading to perceptions of favoritism. • Support & Competence: Leaders are expected to champion, support, and set the standard, yet many do not demonstrate proficiency with basic systems (such as the ATS), which undermines their credibility. • Engagement & Honesty: Feedback mechanisms, such as the annual survey, are not treated as meaningful. Employees feel their concerns are dismissed, with issues often attributed to technology or former employees rather than being acknowledged and acted upon. The cumulative impact is an unhealthy and discouraging work environment. While “toxic” is often overused, in this case, it accurately reflects the gap between what the department projects externally and the lived reality of employees internally. For the health of the organization and to protect its reputation, it is recommended that this department be carefully reviewed. Leadership should be held accountable for building a culture based on respect, equality, competence, and transparency.

avatar
Citizens Response
9mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. This is certainly not the type of culture that we support. If you'd like to share more so that we can look into your concerns, please contact the HR Service Center (hrservicecenter@citizensbank.com).
Viewing 172 - 174 of 4,790 Reviews

Glassdoor has 5,071 Citizens reviews submitted anonymously by Citizens employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Citizens is right for you.