CoStar Group reviews

2.7

33% would recommend to a friend

(3,028 total reviews)
avatar

Andrew C. Florance

30% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

CoStar Group has an employee rating of 2.7 out of 5 stars, based on 3,028 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The CoStar Group employee rating is 22% below average for employers within the Real Estate industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
Aug 19, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is a salary* and there are benefits. That is all

Cons

To start, look at the company's reputation. It's low for a reason. The 5 star reviews are added by managers who are internally ordered to do so. Reach out to anyone who's been in the role directly to ask if you can chat prior to accepting any position in the company. Don't be fooled by the title. The position used to be for actual architectural photographers who were incentivized to focus on quality over quantity. This hasn't been a thing since 2021. Now, all the actual photographers have left, been fired because they refused to lower standards at the cost of their metrics, or have died inside because they need the salary and benefits for their families. The role now mostly consists of snapping photos of assigned buildings, the same as what the field research photographers did back in the day. Something you could do with a phone. You'll also be expected and assigned tasks that are unsafe and borderline legal. An ask for forgiveness, not for permission mentality. Just don't expect the company to have your back if you do get into any situations. *The salary is extremely low for the number of hours you'll be expected (not explicitly) to work to keep on top of ever changing metrics. And don't be fooled by the idea of a company car or camera gear. That car will monitor everything you do, and the gear is to honeypot unsuspecting people into the role. Numerous current and former AP's have suffered from health issued related to stress. One in Texas had a heart attack. This is not normal. Oh, and there was a small movement to unionize a few years back. The company fired the organizers and a good chunk of the people who were in a group email (whether they were for unionizing or not). They followed this up with a condescending email that told us we were basically stupid for considering any options to maybe relieve some of the stress they constantly pile onto us. And they destroyed an ex employee legally for creating a meme account on IG that mostly mocked the CEO, but also shared horror stories from current and former employees.

1.0
Aug 17, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Pay is decent, with the “possibility” of a monthly bonus if you happen to line up with whatever arbitrary metrics management decides that week. 2. The role gets you out in the field instead of chained to a desk. 3. Access to professional-grade gear most photographers could never afford on their own. 4. Constant interaction with new people in public spaces, at events, or on client shoots. 5. The occasional chance to work in genuinely beautiful locations. 6. Flying a drone commercially is one of the few aspects that actually feels fun.

Cons

Where to even begin… 1. Leadership without backbone. Management appeared more interested in pleasing executives than actually leading and guiding staff, which left employees without any real direction or clarity. 2. Chaotic operations. Assignments were often sent out late Friday nights, with the assumption that staff would work weekends. Pushing back on giving up any personal time usually led to being labeled as “inefficient" and "high-maintenance." Mind you, employees talk to each other, and not 1 photographer has said that they work less than 50-60 hrs a week. 3. Unsustainable workloads. Employees were regularly tasked with scouting, photographing, filming, editing, curating, uploading, and captioning 50+ parks and schools per week at the beginning of 2024. This metric was described as the “minimum safe metric.” Tasks and assignments eventually changed, but every new assignment had less value attached to it, adding more work and effort on the photographer's side to reach any metrics. Unfortunately, any employees ended up using PTO days just to catch up on editing. 4. Swarm phases. At a moment’s notice, photographers were required to travel to remote markets for 4–5 days straight, cramming in two weeks’ worth of assignments during that stretch. Travel was often encouraged over weekends to capture “authentic life” in public spaces, with zero consideration for personal time. Once back, employees were still expected to edit, upload, caption, and curate tens of thousands of images and videos in just five days. Travel was never listed or mentioned in the initial job description or interviews, and despite lots of push by photographers, they slyly made it a mandatory occurrence regardless of whether you couldn't travel due to personal differences and decisions. 5. Field work with little support. Staff were expected to complete assignments in extreme weather, deal with reshoots caused by shifting priorities, last-minute scrambles, and make sure they find work and organize it in a way that can help them reach their metrics, all while being efficient in the field. Photographers have had to handle everything alone when confronted with security issues, police stops, harassment, or hostile environments. It always felt like “this is your problem, not Costars, but here's the company's security management phone number if you need it." 6. Misleading job expectations. Roles were advertised as creative and fulfilling, but quickly turned into high-volume, low-quality production work that bore no resemblance to the original job description or responsibilities. 7. No expense coverage. Despite being on the road daily, field employees received no stipends for food, coffee or basic travel expenses outside of what the costar car provided. 8. Training out of touch. The focus was on software and creative “standards” rather than the reality of hitting impossible quotas under constant field issues and ever-changing assignment deliverables. 9. Moving targets. Priorities shifted daily, making planning nearly impossible and leaving employees scrambling to keep up with inconsistent demands. 10. Company-wide routine layoffs. After the homes.com launch, job cuts became a regular occurrence. Many employees realized they had been brought on simply to push the company past that milestone and were made to feel disposable by design. And the culture at the top has been made clear by Senior VP and Global Operations, Lisa Ruggles, who mentioned the employees' struggles during a company-wide meeting and responded: “Suck it up, buttercup, this is the job, what did you expect?” If you’re considering this company, be aware: the reality is extremely long hours, unstable and unexpected priority shifts, and a revolving door of completely burned-out employees.

1.0
May 29, 2025

Join if you want to CRY

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are no pros other than you have a job.

Cons

-Employees working for 10+ years have their favorites and don't like if anyone smarter than them join their team. Since they have experience they manipulate the management and send bad feedback. -The higher management is so narrow minded. -You have to commute daily to work and appear in all calls on video and keep giving proof that you are working. Basically if you are good at show off than actual hard work, this place is for you. You cannot compain to the HR either as they don't act. Haha.

Viewing 481 - 483 of 3,028 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,120 CoStar Group reviews submitted anonymously by CoStar Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if CoStar Group is right for you.